Martha Kongsgaard, chairwoman of the Puget Sound Leadership
Council, has always spoken with a voice of both reason and passion
while guiding the Puget Sound Partnership in its efforts to restore
Puget Sound to health.
Martha Kongsgaard
Yesterday and today, Martha attended her final meeting as a
member of the Leadership Council, the governing body of the
Partnership charged with coordinating Puget Sound ecosystem
recovery.
While listening to presentations on technical and financial
issues, Martha always seems to quickly focus discussions on the key
issues of recovery while asking how to help average people
understand the complex problems.
As a reporter, I’ve enjoyed speaking with Martha, who not only
answers my questions in a direct and revealing way but also
indulges my curiosity. Our discussions often take tangents onto
other interesting subjects, sometimes leading to new stories or old
stories told in a new way.
Nobody doubts Martha’s love of Puget Sound, expressed by her
willingness to spend countless unpaid hours working for a better
future.
By swimming the entire Green/Duwamish River in King County, Mark
Powell hopes to show that the river’s full length — roughly 85
miles from the mountains to Puget Sound — is a single system worthy
of protection and restoration.
I believe that most people have heard about the Duwamish
Waterway in Seattle, a channelized, industrialized section of the
lower Duwamish River where decades of pollution are being cleaned
up, one step at a time. But how much does anyone know about the
upper end of the river, which begins as a trickle of crystal clear
water in the Cascade Mountains south of Snoqualmie Pass?
Mark Powell
“Almost nobody knows the river well, not even the people who
live along the river,” Mark told me.
Mark, the Puget Sound Program director for Washington
Environmental Council. said the idea of swimming the entire river
came to him during the kickoff of a new
Green/Duwamish Watershed Strategy by King County and Seattle.
The plan is to identify all the significant problems in the
watershed (map,
PDF 1.1 mb) and to increase restoration efforts where
needed.
“I thought this would be an interesting way to connect with
people,” Mark said. “I’m a guy who likes to get outdoors, so this
is a personal commitment I could make.”
Mark swam around Bainbridge Island in the winter of 2008-09.
““By swimming the whole coastline, I’m not just diving to the
pretty spots. I’m forced to look at the gross parts,” he told
reporter Michelle Ma in a story for the
Seattle Times.
So far, Mark has been swimming the upper and middle portions of
the Green/Duwamish River. He said his biggest surprise is finding
pockets of good habitat everywhere he goes.
Earlier this month, he was accompanied on the river by Sheida
Sahandy, executive director of the Puget Sound Partnership, and
Martha Kongsgaard, chairwoman of the partnership’s Leadership
Council. A few days before they swam the river near Auburn, the
Leadership Council approved new “vitals signs” indicators for
“human health” and “human well-being” to emphasize the human
connection to the Puget Sound ecosystem. See
“Water Ways” July 30.
The human connection was still on Sheida’s mind when I talked to
her about a week after her trip to the Green River. The most
“eye-opening” part of the swim for her was the condition of “this
incredibly beautiful natural element coursing through a very urban
landscape.”
She saw evidence of people living along the river in
less-than-desirable conditions, she said. There were barbecues and
trailer houses but no suggestion that people had any connection to
the river — except that some individuals apparently were using it
as a toilet, she said.
“I haven’t quite wrapped my head around that, but it feels very
right that we are considering human well-being,” she explained. “On
the one hand is what we have done to the river. On the other hand
is what we have done to ourselves. We need to figure out how it all
links together.”
Mark’s adventures on the river are chronicled in a blog called
“Swim
Duwamish.” He hopes to swim every section of the river where he
is allowed to go and be safe. A portion of the Green River
controlled by the city of Tacoma has no public access, because it
is a source of the city’s water supply. Rapids in the Green River
Gorge are said to be dangerous, so Mark will look for a guide to
help him. And because of heavy marine traffic in the Duwamish
Waterway, he may use a boat to escort him on his approach to
Seattle’s Elliott Bay.
The Green/Duwamish River may be the most disjointed river in
Puget Sound, both physically and psychologically. People who have
seen the industrialized lower river find it hard to visualize the
near-pristine salmon stream spilling clean water down from the
mountains. It is the upper part that provides the inspiration to
clean up the lower part, Mark told me.
“If there was a reason for sacrificing a river, you could find
it in the Duwamish,” he said. “But we can’t afford to sacrifice
even one river. To me, this is what protecting Puget Sound is all
about. By the time the pollution gets to Puget Sound it is too
late.”
If salmon can make it through the gauntlet in the lower river,
they may have a fighting chance to spawn and produce a new
generation of Green River fish. Improving their migration corridor
is not an impossible dream.
I suggested to Mark that the name of the river be officially
changed to “Green/Duwamish” or “Green-Duwamish” to help people
recognize that this is a single river from the mountains to Puget
Sound. After all, the name “Salish Sea” has helped some people
realize that we share an inland waterway with Canadians. The other
name-change option would be to call it Duwamish all the way.
Until I started reading about the Duwamish, I didn’t realize how
this river once captured water from the Black River and the White
River as well as the Green River and the Cedar River. But the
system has changed drastically over the past century or so.
As you can see in the map on this page, the Green River once
joined the White River and flowed north, picking up waters from the
Black River. The Black River, which took drainage from Lake
Washington, picked up water from the Cedar River.
Where the Black River merged with the White River, it became the
Duwamish all the way to Puget Sound.
Two major events changed the rivers’ flow and subsequently the
nomenclature. In 1906, a flood diverted the White River to the
south into the channel of the Stuck River, which flowed into the
Puyallup River. Shortly after that, the White River was
artificially confined to keep it flowing south. Because the river
flowing north contained water only from the Green River, the name
“White” was changed to “Green” downstream to where the Duwamish
began.
The other big event was the construction of the Lake Washington
Ship Canal in 1917 to connect the lake with Puget Sound. The
construction lowered the lake by more than 8 feet, with the lake
level controlled by the Hiram M. Chittenden Locks. The Black River,
which had taken the discharge flow from Lake Washington before
construction, then dried up. The Cedar River, which had flowed into
the Black River, was diverted into the lake.
Following those changes, the Green River and the Duwamish became
essentially the same river, with the total flow perhaps one-third
as much as it had been before the changes. If you are interested in
this history and other geological forces at work in the area, check
out the 1970 report by the U.S. Geological Survey
(PDF 53.1 mb).
To reporters in Western Washington, Billy Frank Jr. was the
essential interview when it came to reporting on fish and shellfish
issues.
Billy Frank Jr. greets
Interior Secretary Sally Jewell in Suquamish.
Kitsap Sun photo by Rachel Anne Seymour
Always gracious and enthusiastic, Billy would take my calls at
just about any time of day, sometimes between conferences in
Washington, D.C. He was willing to talk about anything, from
environmental problems to court rulings. You name it.
Usually, he was not the best person to discuss the rigorous
details I might need for a story. He left that to others. But one
could always count on Billy to passionately expound upon the needs
of salmon and how a particular policy or legal agreement would
further the cause.
At 83 years old, Billy had watched the rapid rise of modern
development and the sad decline of salmon populations throughout
Puget Sound. He was at the center of the battle to restore tribal
treaty rights and claim a place at the table where decisions are
made regarding natural resource policies.
It didn’t matter to Billy if you were a concerned citizen, a
U.S. senator or the president himself. He would greet people with a
hug and thank them for their efforts. During his off-the-cuff
speeches, he would urge everyone to keep working together, no
matter what conflicts needed to be overcome.
Billy, chairman of the Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission,
was in Kitsap County — Suquamish to be specific — 10 days ago to
meet with Interior Secretary Sally Jewell. Kitsap Sun reporter
Rachel Seymour heard him address the issue of salmon hatcheries.
See
Kitsap Sun, April 24 (subscription).
“Our hatcheries are under attack,” he said, saying that Puget
Sound had become “poison” to the salmon. “The hatcheries are there
because the habitats are gone. Big business says it costs too much
to have clean water.”
That was classic Billy Frank, shooting straight into the heart
of the matter.
I knew Billy on a professional level, but he had this rare trait
for making everyone feel like a friend. Of all the stories I wrote,
Billy was particularly pleased that I kept following the culvert
lawsuit years after it seemed forgotten by most people — even the
judge. In that case, the court ruled that Washington state has a
duty under the treaties to fix highway culverts that impede the
passage of salmon.
Billy appeared comfortable in most settings. He would plead and
demand, calling on people to do the right thing, his speech
peppered with occasional profanity. He was easily excited at
reports of progress, but always disappointed at the extremely slow
pace of ecosystem recovery.
His vision was to restore salmon populations to some semblance
of their glory when people could still make a living from the
bounty of nature. Without thinking, I always believed that Billy
would be around to see his vision fulfilled, no matter how long it
took.
Martha Kongsgaard, chairwoman of the Puget Sound Leadership
Council, recalled hearing Billy speak last Thursday at the Salish
Sea tribal dinner.
“Billy assured us that he would be here for at least another
decade — he had so much work to do,” Martha wrote in a thoughtful
tribute to Billy. “He mentioned that his father lived to be 104 and
his mother 96 and that he hoped to split the difference. He was on
fire, naming names, calling us all to the cause, to come together.
He was as powerful as any in the room had ever heard him.”
As was his habit, Billy got up Monday and got dressed after his
shower. He sat down on his bed and didn’t get back up. His son
Willie found him a short time later.
It will be up to others to continue the fight to protect and
restore salmon to Puget Sound. We can be sure that there will never
be another Billy Frank. But those who knew him or heard him speak
can still be empowered by the indomitable passion that made him
such an unforgettable force.
Kitsap Sun/Associated Press story,
“Tribal rights pioneer Billy Frank Jr. dies,” includes
statements from Leonard Forsman, chairman of the Suquamish Tribe,
and Jeromy Sullivan, chairman of the Port Gamble S’Klallam
Tribe.
It began, “Gov. Chris Gregoire today appointed retired Army
Corps of Engineers Col. Anthony Wright to lead the Puget Sound
Partnership.”
That’s strange, I thought. What happened to Gerry O’Keefe, who
had served in the ranks of the partnership before being named
interim director and then permanent director just 16 months
ago.
What could O’Keefe have done to get fired so suddenly? There was
no mention of O’Keefe until the last paragraph of the press
release, where the governor stated:
“I thank Gerry O’Keefe for his work over the past year to lead
this agency. He has thrown his heart and soul into the work of the
partnership, and I wish him well.”
Before I wrote my story, I interviewed numerous people. As far
as I could tell, O’Keefe’s departure came as a complete surprise to
nearly all the staff at the partnership, to members of the
Ecosystem Coordination Board and to others close to the agency.
The press release still leaves me wondering a bit, but I can
thank Martha Kongsgaard, chairwoman of the Puget Sound Leadership
Council, for speaking candidly to me about what happened. To
summarize, Martha said the governor wanted a higher profile person
in the post, someone who could have an impact with the Legislature;
converse with federal, state and local entities; and connect with
the public. Clearly, the governor would like the Puget Sound
Partnership (“her baby,” Martha said) to survive and hopefully to
thrive as a new governor comes on next year.
You can read Martha’s comments to me in the story I wrote for
yesterday’s Kitsap Sun. Martha also prepared a written
message for the Puget Sound Partnership’s website, recognizing
O’Keefe’s contributions in more detail than the governor.
I could not reach O’Keefe Friday, so I can’t report how he’s
taking the news, but Martha and others have told me that he is
likely to take a job with the Washington Department of Ecology. No
doubt the position will be less stressful.
As for Wright, everyone I have interviewed is impressed with his
success as district engineer and commander for the Seattle District
of the Army Corps of Engineers. “I like him,” is a direct quote
from several people.
I have never been formally introduced to Col. Wright, but I do
recall his testimony before the Puget Sound Leadership Council
about a year ago, when he told council members they need to get
some “courage” in dealing with land-use issues, such as development
along the shoreline. Of course, he realized that much shoreline
development falls under the purview of cities and counties, but it
is the job of the Puget Sound Partnership to push local governments
to do the right thing for Puget Sound.
When I reached Tony Friday, he began with a few straight-laced
comments, such as, “I am glad to join the team” and “Puget Sound
has lots of big challenges.”
But when I reminded him of some of his more outspoken comments,
he became a quotable figure, perhaps foreshadowing how he will
communicate about Puget Sound — something many people agree needs
to be brought to a new level. From my story:
“I’ve been told that I’m outspoken. It is time for some plain
talk, because the sound has serious problems. Some people don’t
think it does. Some people want to rearrange the deck chairs.
That’s not my style…
“Some things are really challenging. Sometimes you have to
embrace the porcupine.”
He also told me that, as an Army officer, he has tried to be
apolitical, which could help him work across party lines on
restoring Puget Sound and managing the partnership.
“I think the organization is important and has a really key
role…,” he told me. “It will be a lot of fun.”
I’m glad he is bringing that kind of attitude to the Puget Sound
Partnership. I’m looking forward to reporting on how Col. Anthony
Wright leads the way.
It won’t be long before local governments will be called on to
do their part to restore Puget Sound.
That’s one conclusion I drew yesterday from a conversation
between representatives of the Puget Sound Partnership and the
Kitsap County commissioners.
Martha Kongsgaard, chairwoman of the PSP’s Leadership Council,
and PSP Executive Director Gerry O’Keefe have been visiting local
governments throughout Puget Sound to learn what they are doing now
and to gauge their capacity and willingness to do more to improve
the natural environment.
It has long been recognized that the effort to protect and
restore Puget Sound requires the support of the people who live
here. And local officials tend to be much closer to those living in
their community. As a result, they can often bridge the gap between
decision-makers at the top levels and the people who need to make
changes in their daily lives.
When I wrote my recent
progress report on the Puget Sound Partnership, my story
included little more than brief quotes and snippits of information
from a variety of informed people. It is somewhat rewarding to have
a blog where I can bring you more complete impressions of the
people I interviewed. Here is the first in a series of expanded
reports from those interviews.
Martha Kongsgaard took over as chairwoman of the Puget Sound
Partnership in July of last year, when Bill Ruckelshaus retired
from the position. Martha previously was vice chairwoman.
See news release, July 20.
Martha
Kongsgaard
Although I had interviewed Ruckelshaus many times over the
years, this was the first major interview I conducted with
Kongsgaard, best known as the founder of the Kongsgaard-Goldman
Foundation. The foundation supports various nonprofit
environmental, social justice and arts organizations throughout the
Northwest. She has served on boards and committees of Earthjustice,
Islandwood, the Future of the Law Institute and Friends of the
Methow.
Martha grew up in Napa, Calif., where her family raised cattle
and operated vineyards. In 1988, she married Peter Goldman and
collaborated with him to establish the foundation that carries
their names.
In our interview, Kongsgaard said a lot of frustration has been
expressed around the goal of cleaning up Puget Sound by 2020. While
that may be a goal to “agitate around,” the effort to protect and
restore Puget Sound will be ongoing, no matter how much is
accomplished by 2020, she said. Continue reading →
When I returned to work today after two weeks of vacation, I
learned that Bill Ruckelshaus was “retiring” as chairman of the
Leadership Council — the governing board for the Puget Sound
Partnership.
It has always seemed to me that Ruckelshaus was the steady hand
on the wheel as the Puget Sound Partnership moved through stormy
seas. Certainly, Ruckelshaus deserves to retire after a long career
of public service and business enterprise.
But wait. Bill does not retire the way you or I might. In a
conversation this afternoon, I learned that he is preparing to lend
a hand to the Puget Sound Foundation — the educational and
private-fund-raising arm of the Puget Sound Partnership.
Oh, I said to him, with government funding drying up, you think
you can go out and find private money to save Puget Sound?
He laughed. “It might be awkward to raise money as the chairman
of a state agency,” he noted. The first step, he said, is to
establish goals for how donations might be spent. Private donors
generally want firm guidelines, he said. Continue reading →