State Rep. Sherry
Appleton, D-Poulsbo (left), was one of only two lawmakers to vote
against a bill that would restrict prisoners’ public record
requests. This fact was pointed out by commenter “Fedup”
on this blog yesterday, and made me curious to find out why she
stood up against nearly all of her fellow legislators.
First, a quick recap: Senate Bill 5130 aims to give judges the
authority to block prisoners’ public records requests if they find
they’re for the purposes of harassment. One other lawmaker in both
houses voted against it aside from Appleton.
Here was her rationale.
“I voted against the bill because it means that (The Department of Corrections) could or (The
Department of Social and Health
Services) could turn down requests for documents of prisoners
who have legitimate reasons for requesting records,” she wrote on
email. “Many prisoners represent themselves, pro se, and this means
it will be harder to obtain records.”
“This is a question of justice,” she added.
She believes that in cases of harassing public records requests,
those who are victimized in them — be it a law enforcement officer,
lawyer, or otherwise — are already protected.
” … The statutes already protect confidential information such
as address, phone number and family members,” she wrote. “The
problem is that the agencies are not enforcing the tools the
have. Hence my no vote.”
I interviewed State Attorney
General Rob McKenna, and he disagreed with such an assessment.
He said there’s a group of about 10 inmates who are abusing the
power of the public records request. I’ll have more on that in an
upcoming story.
First, here’s why McKenna’s office, which wrote the bill,
advocated for it, taken from
their web site:
Continue reading →
Share on Facebook