Derek Sheppard writes:
Earmarks (Pork to some.) got a discussion below after Norm Dicks visited last week.
A Sunday piece in the Seattle Times by Andrew Garber shed some light on the earmarks process in the state Legislature, too.
In the paper and online on Sunday (I can’t find it on the Web site today) they ran a map showing the 11 legislative districts with the highest earmark spending during the 05-07 and 07-09 bienniums.
All three Kitsap/Mason districts made the list. The 35th was second, with $17.7 million. (The 37th in southeast Seattle topped the list with just under $21.4 million.)
The 23rd District was eighth, with $9.85 million, and the 26th rounded out the list in 11th with $6.5 million. (The 26th and 5th district tied with $6.5 mil.)
Here’s the gist from the story:
While many earmarked projects may be worthwhile, they often get little scrutiny. Their merits aren’t widely debated in legislative hearings. Sometimes you can’t tell which lawmaker asked for a particular project.
Earmarked spending has reached record highs since Democrats gained control of the state House, Senate and governor’s office in 2004.
Since 2005, lawmakers have spent or allocated nearly $270 million on earmarks in the capital budget, which funds construction projects. That’s more than was spent in the previous 15 years combined.
Millions more in lawmaker-requested spending is included in the state operating budget.
The 35th’s Tim Sheldon was a source in the story:
Sen. Tim Sheldon, a conservative Democrat from Potlatch, Mason County, says that when Democrats held a narrow majority in the Senate, he was able to leverage his vote to get about $100 million in transportation and capital budget projects for his district.