Tag Archives: Medicare

QUALITY LIFE- TOO EXPENSIVE?

QUALITY LIFE- TOO EXPENSIVE?
CHEAP DEATH – IS IT REALLY?
WHO DECIDES?

Since when does living a quality life for the medically or physically challenged mean too costly for taxpayers?

Living a quality life, to me, means seeing and feeling the world around us…seeing the sparkle and sharp colors of new daybreak splash slowly across the horizon and its new dawn promise, the muted and soft streaks of a sunset inch across the sky at day’s end, the happy, funny gurgle and contented baby coo, a bee’s buzz as it flits from flower to flower, the busy chirp and chat of birds, the cheery tug of anticipation at the shout of “STRIKE ONE!” when your child or grandchild is at bat, the intoxicating smell of freshly mowed grass, an unexpected hug from a friend, the excited bark of a welcome home greeting and the warm feel and tangy smell of a horse and the soft nudge of her head for a carrot treat – all blend together.

None have a price tag. One or more of these things and many more, give a quality life without a price tag.

Yes, for seniors, when major disease requiring intensive treatment costly to the body and pocketbook is diagnosed, open and honest dialog between the patient and doctor is a vital step to making the right decision for each patient.

If the patient is already under treatment for life altering medical conditions and treatment, the patient must be fully informed of the new estimated treatment, length and intensity of recovery, adding the cause and effect to the existing medications and prognosis.

Who should make the decision? The patient knows when his/her quality life is over. For me, it is when I can no long feel anything but the pain …when the world around me ceases to matter…before I can no longer take care of my personal needs and can’t recover…its time.

I know, understand and approve age and other limits on lungs and organ transplants. I don’t get mammograms, apps or colon tests simply because should any prove positive, I won’t do anything about it.

My doctor and I have already talked about quality of life and she is incredibly wise and informs, yet accepts my decisions about my own health care. My family knows exactly how I feel and it is not their decision, it is my life and my decisions.

It is not your decision either. I think the patient’s doctor and other medical professionals – NOT including the government – need to present the facts to the patient in a kind, straightforward manner and let the patient and medical team make the decision regarding treatment or no treatment.

IF the facts are presented properly and honestly in each case, very few, if any, senior patients would choose to undergo serious surgery, intensive recovery time, loss of ability to care for their own personal hygiene and waste what remains of their time on earth. Each situation is different and individual.

I was once present when an elderly patient was taken to the emergency room. He clearly had dementia, yet was given – it seemed – a test on every new and old machine in the hospital. One scene stands out in memory…the technician reading aloud the instruction booklet as she hooked the patient to the machine. None of the tests were productive. I’m sure it was an expensive visit.

Keep terminally ill folks comfortable … but all these things should be discussed with the PATIENT long before emergencies and urgency cloud the overall issue.

I doubt my grandmother had much quality of life after she entered the nursing home. Her false teeth were stolen along with other personal items. She fought to get out of bed and walk until she was drugged to keep her compliant and easy to care for. Soon she couldn’t get out of bed by herself and was eventually spoon fed and diapered.
Quality of life? She was over ninety, did not recognize anyone and had forgotten how to speak English. The grandmother I knew was gone.
Why hadn’t she been allowed to walk and maintain a quality of life? Too expensive?

Keep government out of health care and a single pay. Let the free enterprise system flourish and see the health care costs diminish and patient care increase. Let the insurance companies compete for business across the nation. Allow our system to work and use the system we already have in place to correct and make the needed changes. NOT GOVERNMENT.

Remember the $600 toilet seats government bought and regular folks only paid about $50 for the same seat? How about Social Security? How many years before its bankrupt and the people paying into it now will probably never get to use it?

How has the government run Clunkers worked out for our tax dollar and the economy? Well, a lot of folks bought, free, thanks to the Clunkers program, electric golf carts.

Medicare is government run…is it successful?
Please.
The government run Medicare and Medicaid is the reason the medical profession is the only profession I know of in this country that is penalized for being in health care and treating seniors and Medicaid patients.
Patients are cheated, physicians and health care professionals are cheated…and some cheat in return.
Keep government out of the health care business… for your kids’ sake.

No one in this country is denied health care…hospitals have shut their doors before or after the bankruptcy for treating patients without payment. No one is turned away. However, how long can any organization last without revenue?

In addition, ask yourself how long a civilization can last or should last, if their citizens are evaluated and cared for based on dollars not spent?

Frank and open honest discussion with the patient – educate them – will make a difference…not manipulation based on dollars. .

NO to government health care.

More later … Sharon O’Hara
This blog post was an answer to a post on Rob’s blog and tantalizing title: http://www.kitsapsun.com/news/2009/oct/16/rob-woutat-a-dying-person-needs-death/

Health Care Reform Gallops On

Rachel Pritchett interviewed several health care professionals resulting in her article on health care reform in today’s Kitsap Sun. I started to make a few comments in response, and then decided to put it here in COPD and Other Stuff.

Following is the url to Rachel’s article and my comments to excerpts of her story.
http://www.kitsapsun.com/news/2009/aug/02/local-leaders-weigh-in-on-health-care-reform/unday, August 2, 2009

“Barbara Malich, CEO of Peninsula Community Health Services, said much of the reform talk is about expanding coverage, but rarely about improving access. Policies may lack dental care or mental-health coverage, causing even those who are insured to pay full freight or go without, she said.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Patient here: Dentistry and mental health should be part of the health care picture for patients. I know patients whose doctor will not take Medicare premiums, forcing the patient to pay out of pocket. That is fine for those who can afford it but what happens to the folks who can’t afford it? What happens to them?

How well can the body be when a tooth is infected or other dental problems?
Teeth and mouth attach to the body…why do we separate one from the other? Good dental care is vital to one’s health.
***************
‘Brian Wicks, president of The Doctors Clinic…“Right now, we’ve got everybody paid (based on units) of work performed, not compensated for coordination of care and disease prevention,” he said.…

Reform also should include incentives for providers to look at alternatives to traditional end-of-life care that often subjects patients to long stays in intensive-care units and risky and expensive surgeries. Instead, he said, providers should be encouraged to discuss options outside of surgery and the ICUs.

“Nobody compensates us for having that kind of group meeting to coordinate the care for that patient.” Wicks said.

To prevent widespread duplication of medical tests, providers should be able to access patients’ electronic records, even if those records are with a different provider, he said. Providers often end up ordering tests that have already been done because they can’t see the whole patient history, he said.’
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Speaking as a patient:
When duplicate x-rays are taken within days of each other by different clinics (urgent care – surgeon) under the same umbrella, same town, is it currently ‘normal’ practice to order the second set only to squeeze the Medicare system? The reason given to this patient by the second doctor (surgeon) was that the first sets of x-rays were not clear enough.

If health reform passes, will the second doctor be unable to retake x-rays even though they are unsatisfactory to her/him?
*****************************************
“Huge savings can be made if reform moves toward a “value-based” payment system, according to Gary Kaplan, CEO of Virginia Mason Medical Center, which has a clinic on Bainbridge Island.

That means providers no longer would be rewarded in Medicare and other reimbursements for performing more tests than necessary, but for providing only treatment that is reasonable.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Patient speaking: I think you are selling doctors short. Fifteen years ago, Virginia Mason had at least one straight up doctor who did not order a battery of tests when he could have, with dad on Medicare and two follow up insurances, we would not have known the difference.

The doctor examined dad, told us what was wrong…and asked if dad wanted to go through more extensive testing that, in his opinion, would give exactly the same diagnosis. The doctor explained dad’s options, answered our questions, even answered questions we had not thought to ask. We were satisfied and dad’s inner ear imbalance unfolded as the good doctor told us it would.
******************
“Scott Bosch, chief executive officer of Harrison Medical Center, is among local provider chiefs hoping reform will help provide insurance for more of the 47 million people who now lack it.

His hospitals spend $30 million annually covering bad-debt and charity cases, with much of that loss coming from uninsured people seeking help through Harrison emergency rooms and urgent cares. If more of those people had insurance, Harrison’s losses might be less…”.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Patient speaking: How can health care reform be addressed until the illegal alien dilemma is solved? What percent of the 47 million people without health insurance are non-citizens of this country?

Government has not proved successful with Social Security, Medicare or Medicaid – what bright light have the for’s seen that tell them that our government can run a health care system any better?
***************************************
“Guy Stitt, president of AMI International Naval Analysts & Advisors of Bremerton, said reform should stop the practice of gender discrimination by insurance companies. It costs him twice as much to insure a 26-year-old female as a 26-year-old male on average, he said. … a woman in her 50s costs him 40 percent more than a man of the same age….”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Patient speaking: Why? What makes the insurance companies discriminate in such a manner? I know males pay more for car insurance…because they are in more accidents than women drivers are in at the same age.

The males higher auto insurance costs don’t reflect on his employment health care costs to his employer . Why, assuming woman have more medical costs than men, (keeping their sons, husbands and fathers healthy) force employers to favor male employees over females due to the increased health insurance cost to the business owner?
*****************
“Just about all the providers and insurers contacted by the Kitsap Sun said they were glad the topic has been moved to the top of national discussion. They also anticipate some kind of reform — maybe a lot less than hoped for — will pass in the fall…”
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Patient here: Change is needed, but not if it takes away from our free enterprise system – the same system my immigrant family came here for – to become Americans. They dreamt of a country, America, where their ideas and hard work are compensated and where the only limitation was a person’s imagination and willingness to work.

Medicare and Medicaid penalize doctors by telling them what they will pay for each procedure…never mind the doctor office overhead and skyrocketing insurance costs. . Add to it the cost of repaying their horrendous medical school debt.

My PCP is indispensable to my health. I trust her and we are in a health care partnership. The two doctors I tried after my previous doctor died did not work out. They might have been good doctors but I didn’t like them. How can anyone form a partnership with a doctor they don’t like?
Doctoring is more than a diagnosis. For the good of our health, we should have the freedom to choose our doctor.

I saw the results of a patient forced to see a doctor barely able to be civil to her. The doctor might well have a different attitude with a patient not on Medicare and able to pay his set fees.

How many patients thrive and get better or the best they can be when forced to see doctors they don’t like or trust and vice versa?

Yes, for health care reform, but do not jump on a hurried agreement that penalizes patients, doctors, hospitals, health care workers or taxpayers and our own government in the long run.

More later… Sharon O’Hara

The Annual ATS Conference and COPD Dutch Study Rocks!

Remember that a local pulmonary doctor was ahead of the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and EXERCISE debate over a decade ago.

The American Thoracic Society (ATS) recent annual meeting in San Diego brought out new study results from Dutch researcher, Annemie Schols, Ph.D., of the Maastricht University Medical Center in the Netherland, according to MedPage Today.

“”I think we should shift toward a personalized lifestyle intervention” for less-advanced patients, Dr. Schols told reporters.”
The long overdue study showed that pulmonary rehab for COPDers less advanced in the disease is both cost effective and had significant health benefits adding to the COPDer quality of life.
(“Note that this study was published as an abstract and presented at a conference. These data and conclusions should be considered to be preliminary until published in a peer-reviewed journal”).

Over a decade ago, in the waiting room of my first pulmonologist, I picked up a brochure offering local pulmonary rehabilitation for lung patients. Well, that was me, a formally fit person who had trouble breathing when I moved. Ignorance made me slow down and I stopped moving much.

When I got in to see the doctor, I asked his nurse what she thought about the program and she surprised me. “Oh, no,” she said, “you don’t qualify. You aren’t advanced enough for pulmonary rehab.”

Disappointed, when I saw the doctor, I showed him the brochure and asked what good a pulmonary rehab program was, if, to qualify, the patient had to be so far gone they have one foot on a banana peel and the other in a grave? I asked why it wasn’t possible for me and people like me to go through such a program before we reached that point.
“It is possible and I’ll make it happen,” he promised. He did make Capri rehab possible for me and I will forever be grateful to him for that..

At rehab, one older man shuffled in pulling his oxygen tank and walker and had to be steadied and helped on and off the machines. I admired him and the other unsteady patients for their efforts, but I marveled at the patience and helpfulness of the staff.

I lived in another county then and drove over an hour each way two or three times a week to attend the rehab. Sometime during the program, I had a sudden decrease in breathing ability, a setback. The pulmonologist gave me a new prescription for another medication, inhaled steroids. He offered no explanation, but would have answered questions had I known what to ask.

Additional great news from the ATS Conference, according to MedPage Today, Dennis Doherty, M.D., moderated a press conference to discuss the study and announce the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services must have a fee schedule in place by January 2010. The motivator is for planned changes in reimbursement for pulmonary rehabilitation programs, leading, I hope, to increased early rehab programs in the U.S. Yes!

Dr. Doherty added that the Dutch study was “unusual in that very few interventions show a four-point improvement on the St. George’s scale. “It’s tremendously difficult in these patients,” he said.”

Over a decade ago, one of our pulmonologist already knew COPDers needed rehabilitation early on. Moreover, he made rehab a reality for at least one of his earlier stage patients. Wherever you are, doctor, thank you for that.

To all the doctors who take the extra time to advise their patients how they can help his or herself improve their own quality of life, thank you.