Oregon spotted frog// Photo courtesy of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife

The two — Harry Greer and Al Delp — not only took the job seriously, their frogs grew larger and with a higher survival rate than identical frogs grown by experts at Woodland Park Zoo and Oregon Zoo.

Sarah Waller, a reporter for KUOW News, tells the story well, and I encourage you to listen to her report. Other accounts are provided in a news release from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife and in a newspaper story by Jennifer Sullivan of the Seattle Times.

What Sarah Waller does not tell us is why the inmates were able to grow larger frogs, so I contacted Marc Hayes, project leader for the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.

“These guys have an enormous amount of time on their hands, and they are able to devote a high level of attention to the frogs they rear,” Hayes told me. “They were able to grow frogs equivalent to 2 to 3 years old in seven months.”

Whereas zoo attendants have other duties and may be unable to feed and care for their frogs more than a couple of times a day, the inmates can give them almost constant attention. As tadpoles, the little animals can get their fill of an algae-like feed, as the inmates clean their tanks of waste after each feeding. In the frog stage, they are given a plentiful supply of tiny crickets dusted with calcium for bone growth.

On average, about half the captive frogs in the program survive to be released, yet the two inmates were able to achieve a survival rate 86 percent.

“I never thought they would be able to do something at this level,” Hayes said.

Released into the wild at Dallman Lake on the Fort Lewis Military Reservation, the larger frogs are expected to avoid predators and stay alive easier than their smaller counterparts, and they should be able to have offspring in the spring of their first year.

There does not appear to be a downside to the fast-growing frogs, Hayes told me, but any problems may be discovered by monitoring the survival of the frogs reared under various conditions.

It appears that all of the frogs tracked last year survived, and this year about one-fourth of the frogs were equipped with a microchip for easier monitoring.

The success of breeding programs at Cedar Creek — including work by inmates on rare prairie plants and butterflies — could increase the opportunities to work with other endangered species.

Frogs are a sentinal species in many Northwest ecosystems, yet their numbers have been decimated by non-native bullfrogs, pollution and disease. If Oregon spotted frogs can be restored to their historical locations, we can hope that other species can survive as well.

Share on Facebook

Tweet This Post 

This newborn calf could become a poster child in the effort to save the Southern Residents from extinction.

Ken’s naming announcement came as a surprise to me, because he rarely uses names for our local orcas. Like most killer whale researchers, Ken and other staffers at the Center for Whale Research generally call the whales by the alpha-numeric system set up by researchers many years ago.

Ken Balcomb is widely acknowledged as the keeper of the census for Southern Resident orcas, and we generally wait for him to acknowledge the birth of a new calf and to give it a number.

Ken told me he hopes to raise awareness about the connection between the survival of the orcas and the abundance of salmon, particularly chinook.

“I was trying to tie this into the fish,” he said. “This (calf) is the star of the show now, and its survival is dependent on the fish.”

Ken’s move kind of bucks the tradition of having The Whale Museum in Friday Harbor name the Southern Residents. (The Vancouver Aquarium in British Columbia names the Northern Residents.) Generally, the whales don’t get a name for several months or a year, because a fairly large percentage of calves die before their first birthday.

Balcomb was one of the founders of The Whale Museum and its “Orca Adoption Program.” He has told me on several occasions that donors to the adoption program often believe that their contributions go to research by the Center. That’s not the case, although The Whale Museum runs educational programs, including an on-the-water effort called SoundWatch. (After my initial post, Whale Museum Director Jenny Atkinson e-mailed me to say that the organization does do some research in connection with its educational programs.)

“I’ve been thinking about this fish thing quite awhile,” Ken told me. “The general public has to be more informed and realize what is at stake here. I wanted to get a name in there and make this (orca) the ‘star’ of the program.”

Ken and his staff have prepared a written explanation about the new name on the Center for Whale Research Web site, which includes baby pictures of the new calf. Here’s a portion of that text:

“We could not ask for a more charismatic indicator, a baby whale, to measure the success of our renewed efforts for restoration. J Pod is the most-watched family of whales in the Pacific Northwest, or perhaps the world; and this is the first year in recent decades that they have produced three babies in one year. We will all be watching, here and worldwide, carefully and respectfully, to see if they beat the odds and all survive. This is the reality show that really means something.”

For their part, folks at The Whale Museum are taking the Center’s naming of the new whale in stride. Jeanne Hyde, who runs the Orca Adoption Program, said her organization will continue its normal naming process next year, when there could be four calves to be named.

“Star” might be a fitting name for the new whale, considering that its mom is named Polaris — also the formal name for the North Star.

“The name ‘Star’ will be one that an awful lot of people will submit,” Hyde said. “We have a process, and we will follow that process.”

That process includes a public vote from a roster of finalists for each whale to be named.

Jeanne told me the naming of killer whales goes back to the early 1980s, when the federal government was considering permits for the capture of killer whales. Opponents of the capture began to name the orcas to change human perceptions and to help people realize that orcas are individuals, each with its own characteristics.

“One of the ways we can help the whales is to connect people to them,” Hyde said. “Names are important. People can connect with the name “Granny” more than to “J-2.”

Share on Facebook

Tweet This Post 

A coho salmon tries to leap into a culvert against the rushing water in a stream above Wildcat Lake Kitsap Sun photo by Meegan M. Reid

It is easy to come up with an answer when we’ve had hardly any rain. The streams are running low; salmon are ready to swim upstream; and fish in the stream are obviously struggling through shallow water. We’ve seen this kind of condition in early fall during many recent years.

When can we say we’ve had enough rain? Well, certainly when a wide variety of streams and rivers are flooding over their banks. But because of the complexity of natural systems, there may never be a “just right” level for salmon.

I was up above Wildcat Lake in Central Kitsap yesterday, discussing the conditions with Jon Oleyar, a biologist for the Suquamish Tribe. Thanks to recent rains, coho salmon are well distributed throughout the Chico Creek watershed, which includes Wildcat Lake.

Jon was excited to find coho far up in streams where he has rarely if ever seen them. The bad news was, for the stream we were watching, the fish seemed to be blocked by a perched culvert where water was gushing out — a culvert that kept the fish from reaching a beautiful stream with overhanging vegetation and plenty of spawning gravel.

Apparently, few fish have made it upstream of this culvert, Oleyar said, because he has never seen a dead salmon on the other side of the road. And while it was exciting to see large salmon get this far upstream, it was disappointing to find their path blocked.

“I had a smile on my face until I realized they couldn’t get through,” Jon told me, and I quoted him in a story I wrote for today’s Kitsap Sun.

For these coho, heavy rains of the past few days have brought them to new habitat. Yet the flows through the pipe have kept them from going any farther. I will watch as the flows drop over time to see if there is a level that allows them to swim through — although they will need to leap up into the culvert to do so.

Meanwhile, the main channel of Chico Creek, five miles downstream, was flowing high and fast, although it wasn’t flooding. I’m not sure if this is good or bad.

Rocks and log weirs, which can be obstacles at low flow, were now submerged, presenting no obstacle at all. On the other hand, resting pools were gone, and salmon were fighting the current and probably using up their energy. Was the flow high enough to wash salmon eggs out of the gravel? I don’t have a clue.

It is easy to see why biologists talk about the value of “structure” in the streams. Fallen trees normally don’t block the entire stream. Even when they do, it is just a short time before the force of the water creates openings for salmon to swim through. Beneficiallly, extensive “structure” creates pools for salmon to rest and hide, no matter how high the flows may be.

The answer to the question of “too much or too little rain?” seems to vary from stream to stream and even upstream and downstream in the same watershed. It is interesting to observe a stream over time to see how streamflows respond to various rates of rainfall and how salmon respond to various rates of flow.

For Kitsap County residents, we have produced an interactive map on the Kitsap Sun Web site that shows where one may look for salmon. Not all the locations have salmon at the same time, but it may be worth a look.

Share on Facebook

Tweet This Post 

Twila Dawn Captain Steve Sigo (right) and First Mate Aaron Leschi (left) help diver Jake Johnston suit up for his dive at Apple Tree Cove near Kingston on Thursday, when the crew brought up an abandoned fishing net.
Kitsap Sun photo by Meegan M. Reid

Kitsap Sun reporter Tara Garcia Mathewson was on a boat Thursday, watching divers bring up a net in Apple Tree Cove near Kingston. See the story she wrote for today’s Kitsap Sun as well as a video.

Ray Frederick of Kitsap Poggie Club first informed me about “ghost nets” more than a decade ago. At the time, officials were just becoming aware about how much damage the nets can do. But, when it came to money, it wasn’t a high priority. State officials were reluctant to allow volunteers to do much, in part because they worried about people’s safety, or so they said. There also seemed to be a concern about using robotic equipment to yank up the nets, because it could harm sea life and undersea habitat where the nets were wrapped around rocks.

Now, with federal stimulus dollars, professional divers are on the job with a goal of removing 3,000 nets before the end of next year. If I’ve done the math correctly, we’re talking about a little more than $1,500 for each net.

For perspective on the history, see stories I wrote for the Kitsap Sun in May of 2000 and in June of 2002.

Share on Facebook

Tweet This Post 

A newborn killer whale calf, designated J-46, was photographed Thursday afternoon while swimming with its mother, J-28, south of Whidbey Island and west of Hansville
Photo courtesy of Fred Felleman

Here’s the new information from the story:

“It was a spectacular encounter,” Felleman said. “They were spread out on both sides of the (Possession) Bank, running north and south.”

“I got a cute shot of the calf riding behind mom’s dorsal fin,” Felleman said, noting that the calf’s grandmother, J-17 or Princess Angeline, stayed between the calf and the boat the whole time. “It was a magical day.”

“Surfing? Really?” I asked Fred. I could picture in my mind the big wave from the freighter, but I couldn’t quite imagine what the whales were doing. Fred said he would send me pictures to share with readers of Water Ways.

Here are three of the pictures he sent, beginning with one of the ship:

Share on Facebook

Tweet This Post 

New orca calf born in J Pod.
Photo by Jeanne Hyde

A newborn killer whale calf has been reported in J Pod, one of the three pods that frequent the Salish Sea, which includes Puget Sound.

This birth brings the population of J Pod to 27 and the total for all three pods to 87.
—–
This appears to be J-28’s first baby. See Center for Whale Research.

For some first-hand accounts of the exciting discovery, check blogs by Jeanne Hyde and Monika Wieland.

Share on Facebook

Tweet This Post 

In any case, a bout with some kind of respiratory bug has knocked me back about five days. I would call it the flu, except that I didn’t have much of a fever.

So now I find myself with a backlog of news stories that I had planned to discuss with you all. Since time doesn’t stop, there will be more stories tomorrow and the day after that.

So I’ll mention some of the interesting stories from the past week and offer you a chance to comment on any of these things. If something provokes your interest or concern, I’ll be happy to moderate or join the conversation.

Fuel spill at PSNS (Thursday)

Last Thursday, 500 gallons of jet fuel spilled from the USS Abraham Lincoln. Fortunately, the ship had been preboomed, so the spill was contained and did not spread out across the harbor.

I covered the first news story on this spill, and I still have some questions, but I haven’t been back to work long enough to get them answered. For example, I have always been told that you shouldn’t preboom highly volatile liquids, such as gasoline and kerosene, for fear they could catch fire. Has something changed about this idea? (I know one boom was already in place, which is now a standard Navy precaution. But they added another.)

Salmon migration (Sunday)

Sunday’s Kitsap Sun featured my annual story encouraging people to go out and watch chum salmon migrating upstream. As usual, the package included a map of local streams (interactive map for online viewers) and tips for watching the fish without disturbing them.

Wherever you live, you may be interested to know how the runs are shaping up, which I covered in a general way. Chum are doing quite well, but not like the records of the recent past. Pinks were amazing. Coho are coming in large, but their abundance varies by location.

Ueland gravel operation (Monday)

Reporter Derek Sheppard filled in well for me on a story I have been following for a couple of years. I’m talking about the public hearing to decide whether a gravel mine, rock quarry and possible concrete batch plant should be built west of Kitsap Lake. There are a lot of issues involved, including traffic on Northlake Way and water quality and quantity going into Chico Creek. The hearing was continued to Dec. 10, so there will be more discussion.

Gravel zoning in Jefferson County (Tuesday)

The Washington State Court of Appeals agreed that the Jefferson County commissioners acted properly in zoning 690 acres in East Jefferson as a “mineral resources land overlay.” Here’s a question: I had understood that the zoning was a prerequisite to the proposed pit-to-pier project, whether or not the zoning stood by itself. But the appeals court ruling states, “(the) future project is not dependent on the proposed action.” If someone would clarify for me, that would be great.

Brown pelican removed from endangered list (today)

I’m not sure how many people check the “Water, Water Everywhere” list at the top of this blog for stories, research and government actions, but I link to a lot of stuff there that I don’t have time to address in detail. Such was the case today with the nationwide de-listing of the brown pelican. Go to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service news release as well as an L.A. Times story.

Share on Facebook

Tweet This Post 

The spill, which hasn’t gotten much attention in our part of the world, appears to be roughly the size of the Exxon Valdez spill, according to estimates. The good thing is that the oil has not hit land, and Australian officials are doing their best to make sure that it doesn’t. Crews are using chemical dispersants and oil-collection equipment.

A fire that started on the oil rig Sunday also was extinguished.

Even though the oil has not hit shore, environmental officials are concerned about the number of marine mammals and sea birds affected by the oil.

“We still have a toxic cocktail created by the thousands of barrels of oil and condensate that have been pouring into the sea, along with the thousands of litres of dispersant,” said Gilly Llewellyn, conservation director for World Wildlife Fund – Australia. “All of this in one of the world’s most intact tropical marine ecosystems.”

Mike Bossley, the managing director for the Australasian office of the Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society expressed concern for the longterm and chronic effects on marine life in the area of the spill, where four species of whales and dolphins and 28 species of birds were spotted in recent days.

To read more, check out these stories:

The Australian: Timor Sea oil leak stopped at last
ABC News (with video): Oil Impact May Last Seven Years
Asia Sentinal: Timor Oil Well Fire Snuffed Out
WA Today: ‘We know what caused oil spill’
Antara News: Australia Limits Montara oil spill`s effects

Share on Facebook

Tweet This Post 

Salish Sea watershed
EPA graphic

The question now is whether the name will catch on and be used more frequently.

One application that comes to mind is the description of the three pods of killer whales known as Southern Residents. I’ve often referred to these animals as the orcas that frequent Puget Sound. That’s because “Southern Residents” have little meaning to the average reader, who wishes to know why they are “southern” and what I mean by “residents.”

It so happens that the Salish Sea just about defines the range of these whales for a large percentage of the year.

Now I may refer to them as the killer whales that frequent or mainly reside in the Salish Sea — including much of the summer in the San Juan Islands, with winter and fall stints into Puget Sound.

I’m not sure how else I will use this term, but I no longer feel constrained by the idea that the Salish Sea is not a real name and has never been defined by any authority.

Here are some facts about the Salish Sea provided by the SeaDoc Society. (I’ve converted meters to feet and kilometers to miles.)

• Coastline length, including islands: 4,642 miles
• Total number of islands: 419
• Total land area of islands: 1,413 square miles
• Sea surface area: 9,942 square miles
• Maximum depth: 886 feet
• Number of different marine animals species estimated: 20 species of mammals, 128 species of birds, 219 species of fish, and over 3000 species of invertebrates
• Number of species listed as threatened, endangered or are candidates for listing: 64
• Total watershed area, not counting the upper Fraser River area (See Stefan Freelan): 42,000 square miles

Share on Facebook

Tweet This Post 

It seems a lot of experts are surprised that we have reached this level of low oxygen, considering that we were seeing near-record high oxygen levels earlier this year. See a story I wrote in August.

Although we have had low-oxygen problems in Hood Canal for years, monitoring buoys installed a few years ago now allow us to see what is happening at the moment and to describe the conditions in some detail.

In 2006, for the first time, scientists were able to show the factors leading up to a fish kill. Until then, it was only reasoned speculation. What may be equally troubling, however, is the level of stress that sea creatures are coming under before and after a fish kill — or if none occurs at all.

I didn’t mention it in my story, but oxygen levels at Twanoh and probably up toward Belfair are even lower than at Hoodsport. Lower Hood Canal is an area where the oxygen is so chronically depleted that fluffy mats of bacteria can be seen growing on the bottom at times when no other life can survive.

I feel that I need to express my disappointment with some of the comments posted to my story. To write this piece, I took note of the monitoring buoys; I pulled together observations of divers and others; and I even informed a few officials about the conditions that were developing.

I told this story straight, basing it on facts and observations that I gathered. Yet some people apparently chose to believe that my writing had something to do with taxation, government control, funding for Puget Sound Partnership, another costly study or hysterical tactics by environmental wackos.

I suppose I should be used to cynical comments by now, and I am glad that one person took the time to say he was pleased that I was “telling it like it is.” I just thought people would like to know of the dire conditions facing sealife in southern Hood Canal and what might occur if a south wind blows.

Share on Facebook

Tweet This Post