Watching Our Water Ways

Environmental reporter Christopher Dunagan discusses the challenges of protecting Puget Sound and all things water-related.
Subscribe to RSS

Incoming and outgoing governors view Puget Sound

November 25th, 2012 by cdunagan

Gov. Chris Gregoire and her replacement, Jay Inslee, still have great hopes for the future health of Puget Sound, as I learned when I interviewed them separately in recent days.

I reserved some of the governor’s comments for a story that appeared in today’s Kitsap Sun titled “Human values count in Puget Sound recovery.”

Jim Barnes of Olympia partakes of an abundance of oysters at Twanoh State Park, which meets outgoing Gov. Chris Gregoire’s call for beaches that are “swimmable, diggable and fishable.” / Kitsap Sun photo by Meegan M. Reid

This is the first of an undetermined number of stories I’ll be writing over the next year or so dealing with ecosystem indicators. Indicators are selected measures to help us understand the pace of progress in restoring Puget Sound. I hope the upcoming stories will reveal something about the functioning of the ecosystem and how the various pieces fit together.

The first story today addresses human health and quality of life, which have always been a central focus of Chris Gregoire’s effort to make sure Puget Sound is “swimmable, diggable and fishable” for future generations.

“Things have not moved as quickly as I had hoped,” the governor told me, referring to efforts by the Puget Sound Partnership. “I thought we got off with a bang, including public engagement. Now, we are into the tough stuff.”

She recalled how, years ago, cleanup efforts focused on reducing industrial discharges. That includes the period from 1988 to 1992, when she served as director of the Washington Department of Ecology. Now most of the serious pollutants reach Puget Sound through stormwater runoff. The current effort is to reduce the volume of water flowing across the ground while eliminating a huge variety of pollutants at their source.

If you read the comments at the end of news stories regarding the Puget Sound Partnership, you could come to believe that the agency has a long way to go in convincing the average person that he or she is part of the problem. But many of the comments are made by cranky people who seem unlikely to be convinced of anything.

In general, most people really care about Puget Sound and simply need help in taking the right steps, according to surveys. In my story today, the partnership’s Dave Ward talks about an indicator that could help measure changes in human behavior.

As for Gov.-elect Jay Inslee, it is hard to tell how things will change under his leadership. He reminded me in our interview that he faces severe budget difficulties — and money certainly is a major factor in Puget Sound recovery. See my story in the Nov. 15 Kitsap Sun.

To the dismay of some opponents, Inslee has always been a strong advocate for the environment. That is not likely to change. He has been a leader on climate change and clean energy, and he has a deep-rooted passion for Puget Sound and the surrounding forests. I learned a good deal about his views a decade ago during an extended interview, which involved a hike through a roadless area in Olympic National Forest. See the Kitsap Sun story from May 19, 2002.

Gov. Chris Gregoire tours an oyster nursery near Shelton in October 2010.
Kitsap Sun file photo by Larry Steagall

While the governor-elect has no immediate plans to change the structure of the Puget Sound Partnership, he stressed that he wants to ensure that restoration projects are guided by science.

Gregoire said during our recent discussion that she would advise the incoming governor to keep up the pressure on the partnership, and she hoped that more funding will become available as the economy recovers.

In October 2010, if you recall, Gregoire emphasized the importance of maintaining Puget Sound programs, despite the financial crisis.

“We are in the hardest economic problem since the deep depression, but we cannot take a recess; we cannot take time out,” she said at that time during a tour of Belfair’s new sewage-treatment plant. See Kitsap Sun, Oct. 15.

In our recent discussion, the governor said she was not able to find as much money for Puget Sound as she had hoped. Here’s how she put it:

“We kept putting money in. We couldn’t let up. I kept pushing for ongoing funding, and we will have to continue to do that for awhile.

“I think we have held our own and made some improvement, but not the improvement we should have. The population continues to grow. We’re going to have to kick it up or we are going to lose ground. I’m not proud of the fact that we are kind of treading water right now.”

She said things are unlikely to get easier right away, because the state is still struggling with its budget. Furthermore, U.S. Rep. Norm Dicks, a successful advocate for federal funding, is leaving office. Dicks was instrumental in putting Puget Sound on a national stage, on par with Chesapeake Bay and the Great Lakes, Gregoire said. She expressed hope that the increased profile for Puget Sound will endure with the help of others in the state’s congressional delegation.

As Washington’s economy recovers, Chris Gregoire would like to see talks turn to a stable funding source, such as a “flush tax” on residents in the Puget Sound region. Another idea debated in the Legislature was a tax on oil and chemical products that could be used for stormwater improvements. Gregoire continues:

“There’s been a lot of talk about a flush tax. We have never really done the research on that. The last couple of years was no time to be thinking about that. We have demands on education and transportation. But we need a sustained reliable source of funding.

“And we need public support. Unless and until we get everyone engaged, we are not going to make it…. I think we are well on our way. Local communities are doing a lot of volunteer work. School groups are monitoring the environment….

“When the recession hit, I have to say, everybody’s attention got drawn away by other concerns: ‘Can I put food on the table? Am I going to lose my job?’

“Now we’ve got to find a better way. We have to have a bottoms-up approach. People must consider themselves part of the solution.”

Tags: , , ,

Email This Post Email This Post Print This Post Print This Post

3 Responses to “Incoming and outgoing governors view Puget Sound”

  1. Scott Grout Says:

    The photo shown of the man from Olympia is quite misleading. He has on knee pads and is using a fork to dig for clams not oysters. The photo also talks of the “abundance of oysters at Twanoh State Park”. If one looks closely at the photo there is an abundance of oysters but they are quite small and not legal for the recreational harvester to harvest due to over harvesting by the local tribe, the Skokomish.

  2. cdunagan Says:

    Scott,

    I’m not sure why you are making these comments, since you were not there when the pictures were taken. Yes, Jim Barnes was wearing knee pads. He frequently got down on one knee to pick up an oyster.

    At the time, there were plenty of large oysters on the beach, but he was looking for smaller ones, because he liked the taste of them. He had an oyster gauge and continually checked them to make sure they were not too small. (The legal size is 2.5 inches across the widest part.)

    As I described in the story, he was using his rake to turn over oysters for a better look. He was not digging clams at the time.

    I was able to make these observations, because I was there when Meegan Reid took these photos. I did not investigate the harvesting by the Skokomish Tribe, but I understand that tribal members are entitled to half the harvestable shellfish under the Rafeedie decision.

    I would be happy to talk to you further if you have additional information you’d like to share.

  3. Scott Grout Says:

    Ijust thought the picture looked like a clam digger, not an oyster picture that is why I said it was misleading to the expert eye. Your right about the tribes commercial harvest of fifty percent but I would ask why is the resoure currently at all time lows? There is no active oversight to verify this currently. Your reference to the Rafaedie ruling is spot on but has it has been modified and amended several times. In 2007 the State Wa., the Tribes, and the Shellfish Growers Association negotiated away the rights of private property owners to satisfy the Tribes thirst for a dwindling resource that has never been harvested with the ident of sustainability. Imagine if the timber industry was cutting down trees with no intent to re-plant the trees until they were nearly all gone. The tribes and the State have fallen short in their responsibility to the citizenry they represent. The tribes are now allowed to harvest 50% of the naturally occuring shellfish that is located on private property. This is a complete contradiction to the Rafeedie ruling which originally stated that private lands were excluded from tribal treaty harvest as long as they were “cultivated and staked”. The photo does show a large number of juvenile oysters but not many look like they are 2.5 inches or greater. The tribes are required to also complete a quantitative study annually to make a determination in managing the fishery. This is not done and has not been done consistetly for some time. The oyster densities at Twanoh State Park are at an all time historic low. When you consider that the natural oyster set in Hood Canal was nearly a non-event in 2011 this is going to impact the resource more than the alteration of the ph level or water quality deterioration.

Leave a Reply

Before you post, please complete the prompt below.

(Not a trick question) What color is the pink house?

Notify me via email of follow-up comments (without commenting):

Available on Kindle

Subscribe2

Follow WaterWatching on Twitter

Food for thought

"In the end, we will conserve only what we love, we will love only what we understand, and we will understand only what we are taught."Baba Dioum, Senegalese conservationist

Archives

Categories