Watching Our Water Ways

Environmental reporter Christopher Dunagan discusses the challenges of protecting Puget Sound and all things water-related.
Subscribe to RSS

Puget Sound Partnership’s local connections

June 16th, 2011 by cdunagan

It won’t be long before local governments will be called on to do their part to restore Puget Sound.

That’s one conclusion I drew yesterday from a conversation between representatives of the Puget Sound Partnership and the Kitsap County commissioners.

Martha Kongsgaard, chairwoman of the PSP’s Leadership Council, and PSP Executive Director Gerry O’Keefe have been visiting local governments throughout Puget Sound to learn what they are doing now and to gauge their capacity and willingness to do more to improve the natural environment.

It has long been recognized that the effort to protect and restore Puget Sound requires the support of the people who live here. And local officials tend to be much closer to those living in their community. As a result, they can often bridge the gap between decision-makers at the top levels and the people who need to make changes in their daily lives.

That bridging role also is played by the multi-layered Puget Sound Ecosystem Coordination Board, which is made up of people representing interest groups as well as geographic areas.

O’Keefe said he sees Kitsap County as a leader in several areas. He specifically mentioned the county commissioners’ Water-As-A-Resource Policy, which calls on county employees to consider the value of all fresh water supplies — even sewage and stormwater, which can be converted to beneficial uses.

“Many communities are coming to the same place,” O’Keefe told the commissioners, “but you are out in front on that.”

County Commissioner Josh Brown said it is easier to show people the benefits of spending money to restore Chico Creek, where salmon can be seen swimming through Kitsap Golf & Country Club. It is harder to sell people on the idea of spending several million dollars to upgrade the Central Kitsap Wastewater Treatment Plant to provide cleaned-up effluent (rather than drinking water) for irrigation.

Brown said he is frustrated when Kitsap County “pushes the envelope” to identify sources of pollution and uses local money to upgrade outdated stormwater systems, when the state proposes a per-capita distribution of fees collected for stormwater improvements. The funds should be available to those who have the best projects and do the best job, he said.

Brown also made a pitch for a regionwide “pollution identification and correction program” proposed by the Hood Canal Coordinating Council. In that program — which needs some outside funding — priorities for cleaning up pollution will be set for the entire Hood Canal watershed, made up of portions of Kitsap, Mason and Jefferson counties.

Kongsgaard said Hood Canal is like a “grandfather” organization, showing the way for other “local implementing organizations” created under state law.

Fitting local goals into regionwide policies and using local governments to advance regionwide goals are among the challenges of the Puget Sound Partnership.

As I write this, I’m riding a ferry from Bremerton to Seattle, where the Leadership Council is scheduled to approve targets for ecosystem indicators during a two-day meeting. How many chinook salmon need to return to local streams before Puget Sound is considered “healthy” is just one of the questions to be answered.

“Part of the whole process is being able to monitor and hold the partnership accountable,” Kongsgaard said. “Without targets and goals and measurables, you are not going to get to the end game.”

The targets are required by state law, but everyone realizes they may need to be changed over time, she added. It’s something that has never been done before.

“Chesapeake hasn’t quite gotten it right,” she noted. “They have been taken over by the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), which is good or bad depending on who you are. But we are going to do this as a community.”

The next step involves an update to the Puget Sound Action Agenda, guided by the targets for ecosystem indicators. That’s where local governments will be asked to make commitments to help restore Puget Sound, particularly when it comes to development and land use.

“With 2 million more people coming down on us, we have got to get real about this,” Kongsgaard said. “We must come together and say we value Puget sound. It is a tremendous economic driver.

“I hope we are brave enough to do something that is not target-light,” she added. “The real meat will be in the action agenda, what it will take to get your work done.”

O’Keefe said city and county officials understand the tools available to them and the political context in which they operate.

“You know,” he told the Kitsap commissioners, “what is possible in your community.”

Tags: , , , , , ,

Email This Post Email This Post Print This Post Print This Post

4 Responses to “Puget Sound Partnership’s local connections”

  1. Kathryn Simpson Says:

    In other words… Federal and state funding resources are not as available as they used to be, so instead of looking for improved efficiency and waste reduction, let’s reprioritize local dollars to fund where federal and state resources were cut.

    Are these environmental programs making a real difference and are they all essential? Ask that first and if you decide that all of the environmental programs are more important than sheriff deputies, road repair, and the other priorities of county governance, then I hope our electeds are well prepared to defend that answer.

  2. Jack Stanfill Says:

    Someone said, “An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.” I hope our County Commissioners will act to correct a situation in the headwaters of Dickerson Creek, and the Chico Wildlife Corridor.

    Craig Ueland did not disclose that he had purchased the adjoining 440 acre Port Blakely property during an appeal hearing on their FEIS. If DCD had had the information, then the on-site road could’ve been moved away from Dickerson Creek.

  3. cdunagan Says:

    Kathryn,

    It’s about much more than money, although money is always an issue. Local governments are largely in charge of growth management, shoreline planning and development regulations — all considered essential elements of the Puget Sound Action Agenda.

  4. pete Haase Says:

    All well and good, but unfortunately, the Partnership has not done much at all here in our county to publicize itself, the issues, and the needs. So here we mostly still just say – “No New Taxes” and “No Loss of Farmland”.

    We need an “Uncle Tom’s Cabin” or “Silent Spring” to capture the essence and light the fires.

Leave a Reply

Before you post, please complete the prompt below.

(Not a trick question) What color is the pink house?

Notify me via email of follow-up comments (without commenting):

Available on Kindle

Subscribe2

Follow WaterWatching on Twitter

Food for thought

"In the end, we will conserve only what we love, we will love only what we understand, and we will understand only what we are taught."Baba Dioum, Senegalese conservationist

Archives

Categories