<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shoreline conflict and confusion have not yet abated</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pugetsoundblogs.com/waterways/2009/11/03/shoreline-conflict-and-confusion-have-not-yet-abated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pugetsoundblogs.com/waterways/2009/11/03/shoreline-conflict-and-confusion-have-not-yet-abated/</link>
	<description>Environmental reporter Christopher Dunagan discusses the challenges of protecting Puget Sound and all things water-related.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 01:11:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cdunagan</title>
		<link>http://pugetsoundblogs.com/waterways/2009/11/03/shoreline-conflict-and-confusion-have-not-yet-abated/comment-page-1/#comment-16525</link>
		<dc:creator>cdunagan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pugetsoundblogs.com/waterways/?p=3860#comment-16525</guid>
		<description>I thought I was helping people to understand Ecology&#039;s reasoning by quoting from selections of the guidance. I put these quotes at the end of the entry (where you click to continue), so people could ignore it if they weren&#039;t interested.

The positions of Jan Angel and Brian Hodges are fairly easy to summarize: If I understand them, they believe the court ruling directs local governments to fall back to the shorelines master programs.

I really have no idea which side is right, but we&#039;ll see if the Attorney General&#039;s Office switches positions as a result of Angel&#039;s letter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought I was helping people to understand Ecology&#8217;s reasoning by quoting from selections of the guidance. I put these quotes at the end of the entry (where you click to continue), so people could ignore it if they weren&#8217;t interested.</p>
<p>The positions of Jan Angel and Brian Hodges are fairly easy to summarize: If I understand them, they believe the court ruling directs local governments to fall back to the shorelines master programs.</p>
<p>I really have no idea which side is right, but we&#8217;ll see if the Attorney General&#8217;s Office switches positions as a result of Angel&#8217;s letter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Donne</title>
		<link>http://pugetsoundblogs.com/waterways/2009/11/03/shoreline-conflict-and-confusion-have-not-yet-abated/comment-page-1/#comment-16523</link>
		<dc:creator>John Donne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pugetsoundblogs.com/waterways/?p=3860#comment-16523</guid>
		<description>No surprise here. You link to Jan Angel&#039;s letter and mention Brian Hodges en passant, but you quote legal advice from DOE verbatim. Isn&#039;t the point that DOE has no business issuing legal advice? 

I think Rep. Angel was right to ask the Attorney General for his guidance on these matters. Legal advice to state bureaucrats is part of his job. This is especially true when court decisions lead to fuzzy logic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No surprise here. You link to Jan Angel&#8217;s letter and mention Brian Hodges en passant, but you quote legal advice from DOE verbatim. Isn&#8217;t the point that DOE has no business issuing legal advice? </p>
<p>I think Rep. Angel was right to ask the Attorney General for his guidance on these matters. Legal advice to state bureaucrats is part of his job. This is especially true when court decisions lead to fuzzy logic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

