<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New members appointed to Fish and Wildlife Commission</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pugetsoundblogs.com/waterways/2009/06/26/new-members-appointed-to-fish-and-wildlife-commission/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pugetsoundblogs.com/waterways/2009/06/26/new-members-appointed-to-fish-and-wildlife-commission/</link>
	<description>Environmental reporter Christopher Dunagan discusses the challenges of protecting Puget Sound and all things water-related.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 04:38:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://pugetsoundblogs.com/waterways/2009/06/26/new-members-appointed-to-fish-and-wildlife-commission/comment-page-1/#comment-12799</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 22:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pugetsoundblogs.com/waterways/?p=2853#comment-12799</guid>
		<description>Tom,

I fully agree with you on that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,</p>
<p>I fully agree with you on that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Rosendale</title>
		<link>http://pugetsoundblogs.com/waterways/2009/06/26/new-members-appointed-to-fish-and-wildlife-commission/comment-page-1/#comment-12675</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Rosendale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 16:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pugetsoundblogs.com/waterways/?p=2853#comment-12675</guid>
		<description>I would think having zoologists or biologists on the Fish and Wildlife commission would be more important to the animals than loading it with environmentalists and people negotiators. Fish and Wildlife does not have an envious track record.

 There are some good members on the commission to be sure, but it also seems there isn&#039;t enough politically appointed positions in the Department&#039;s of Forestry and Ecology to go around?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would think having zoologists or biologists on the Fish and Wildlife commission would be more important to the animals than loading it with environmentalists and people negotiators. Fish and Wildlife does not have an envious track record.</p>
<p> There are some good members on the commission to be sure, but it also seems there isn&#8217;t enough politically appointed positions in the Department&#8217;s of Forestry and Ecology to go around?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
