<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Commerce Secretary Locke could be good for salmon and whales</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pugetsoundblogs.com/waterways/2009/02/25/commerce-secretary-locke-could-be-good-for-salmon-and-whales/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pugetsoundblogs.com/waterways/2009/02/25/commerce-secretary-locke-could-be-good-for-salmon-and-whales/</link>
	<description>Environmental reporter Christopher Dunagan discusses the challenges of protecting Puget Sound and all things water-related.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 01:11:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cdunagan</title>
		<link>http://pugetsoundblogs.com/waterways/2009/02/25/commerce-secretary-locke-could-be-good-for-salmon-and-whales/comment-page-1/#comment-6538</link>
		<dc:creator>cdunagan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pugetsoundblogs.com/waterways/?p=1265#comment-6538</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re really right this time.

Every time I write about legacy lots on Water Ways, I wonder if I&#039;m getting off the topic of water issues. My only excuse is that these dense urbanlike developments in rural areas tend to produce stormwater that can wreak havoc with natural streams and wetlands.

As for the boat cleaner, I&#039;ll leave this open for discussion. I&#039;d like to write a blog entry on &quot;green&quot; cleaners. Maybe I&#039;ll try to get to that sooner rather than later. There are some knowledgeable folks at Kitsap Public Works who would be a good source for both you and me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re really right this time.</p>
<p>Every time I write about legacy lots on Water Ways, I wonder if I&#8217;m getting off the topic of water issues. My only excuse is that these dense urbanlike developments in rural areas tend to produce stormwater that can wreak havoc with natural streams and wetlands.</p>
<p>As for the boat cleaner, I&#8217;ll leave this open for discussion. I&#8217;d like to write a blog entry on &#8220;green&#8221; cleaners. Maybe I&#8217;ll try to get to that sooner rather than later. There are some knowledgeable folks at Kitsap Public Works who would be a good source for both you and me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim C.</title>
		<link>http://pugetsoundblogs.com/waterways/2009/02/25/commerce-secretary-locke-could-be-good-for-salmon-and-whales/comment-page-1/#comment-6519</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 05:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pugetsoundblogs.com/waterways/?p=1265#comment-6519</guid>
		<description>&quot;But then, the last time I checked, the name of this blog was Watching Our Water Ways.&quot;

And that&#039;s why I enjoyed your next post about &quot;Legacy lots are getting attention from Kitsap County&quot;!?

Personally, I would rather stick to the water ways and talk about the great boating season coming up!

I am looking for a good, no great, boat cleaner that is a little more friendly to the water than the normal boat/car soaps...any ideas?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But then, the last time I checked, the name of this blog was Watching Our Water Ways.&#8221;</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s why I enjoyed your next post about &#8220;Legacy lots are getting attention from Kitsap County&#8221;!?</p>
<p>Personally, I would rather stick to the water ways and talk about the great boating season coming up!</p>
<p>I am looking for a good, no great, boat cleaner that is a little more friendly to the water than the normal boat/car soaps&#8230;any ideas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cdunagan</title>
		<link>http://pugetsoundblogs.com/waterways/2009/02/25/commerce-secretary-locke-could-be-good-for-salmon-and-whales/comment-page-1/#comment-6496</link>
		<dc:creator>cdunagan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pugetsoundblogs.com/waterways/?p=1265#comment-6496</guid>
		<description>OK, Jim C., you got me.

We probably should be talking about Gary Locke&#039;s record on education, transportation, crime, international trade and the Seattle Mariners.

But then, the last time I checked, the name of this blog was Watching Our Water Ways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, Jim C., you got me.</p>
<p>We probably should be talking about Gary Locke&#8217;s record on education, transportation, crime, international trade and the Seattle Mariners.</p>
<p>But then, the last time I checked, the name of this blog was Watching Our Water Ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cynic</title>
		<link>http://pugetsoundblogs.com/waterways/2009/02/25/commerce-secretary-locke-could-be-good-for-salmon-and-whales/comment-page-1/#comment-6490</link>
		<dc:creator>cynic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 06:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pugetsoundblogs.com/waterways/?p=1265#comment-6490</guid>
		<description>He may be good for whales and salmon, but he will be a disaster for commerce.  He has never in his life had to run a business at a profit, he doesnt have a clue about creating a favorable business climate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He may be good for whales and salmon, but he will be a disaster for commerce.  He has never in his life had to run a business at a profit, he doesnt have a clue about creating a favorable business climate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim C.</title>
		<link>http://pugetsoundblogs.com/waterways/2009/02/25/commerce-secretary-locke-could-be-good-for-salmon-and-whales/comment-page-1/#comment-6485</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 03:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pugetsoundblogs.com/waterways/?p=1265#comment-6485</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s funny. I had to laugh when I realized your mistake by titling the entry &quot;Commerce Secretary Locke could be good for salmon and whales&quot;.

We know you meant the title to read &quot;Commerce Secretary Locke could be good for the PEOPLE of the United States&quot;. You know, the people who pay taxes and politician&#039;s salaries.

Oh well, anyone can make a mistake. Too funny!

Ps. As for Mr. Garrett, I think the last paragraph is telling concerning his agenda. Too funny!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s funny. I had to laugh when I realized your mistake by titling the entry &#8220;Commerce Secretary Locke could be good for salmon and whales&#8221;.</p>
<p>We know you meant the title to read &#8220;Commerce Secretary Locke could be good for the PEOPLE of the United States&#8221;. You know, the people who pay taxes and politician&#8217;s salaries.</p>
<p>Oh well, anyone can make a mistake. Too funny!</p>
<p>Ps. As for Mr. Garrett, I think the last paragraph is telling concerning his agenda. Too funny!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue Light</title>
		<link>http://pugetsoundblogs.com/waterways/2009/02/25/commerce-secretary-locke-could-be-good-for-salmon-and-whales/comment-page-1/#comment-6476</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Light</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pugetsoundblogs.com/waterways/?p=1265#comment-6476</guid>
		<description>Yes, hopefully in these tough economic times our nation&#039;s Commerce Secretary will make the Southern Resident Orcas his primary concern.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, hopefully in these tough economic times our nation&#8217;s Commerce Secretary will make the Southern Resident Orcas his primary concern.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

