<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good luck untangling shoreline rules after court ruling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pugetsoundblogs.com/waterways/2008/08/02/good-luck-untangling-shoreline-rules-after-court-ruling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pugetsoundblogs.com/waterways/2008/08/02/good-luck-untangling-shoreline-rules-after-court-ruling/</link>
	<description>Environmental reporter Christopher Dunagan discusses the challenges of protecting Puget Sound and all things water-related.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 05:06:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mick</title>
		<link>http://pugetsoundblogs.com/waterways/2008/08/02/good-luck-untangling-shoreline-rules-after-court-ruling/comment-page-1/#comment-1112</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 02:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pugetsoundblogs.com/waterways/?p=717#comment-1112</guid>
		<description>Thank you Jerry .

I guess we will have to waith till next year .  ;0}</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Jerry .</p>
<p>I guess we will have to waith till next year .  ;0}</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry Harless</title>
		<link>http://pugetsoundblogs.com/waterways/2008/08/02/good-luck-untangling-shoreline-rules-after-court-ruling/comment-page-1/#comment-1088</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Harless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 22:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pugetsoundblogs.com/waterways/?p=717#comment-1088</guid>
		<description>The Shoreline Management Act (RCW 90.58) defines &quot;master program&quot; to include not only the plan, but also the &quot;use regulations&quot; adopted to implement said plan, See RCW 90.58.030(3)(b).

If the Shoreline Master Plan specifically refers to the CAO for buffer regulations, then presumably the CAO serves as a &quot;use regulation&quot; to the SMP.  Therefore, the shoreline buffers found in the CAO are effectively a part of the SMP and the Court&#039;s decision has no effect on the County&#039;s shoreline buffer regulations.

Or, in baseball language, the Designated Hitter rule applies only in American League ballparks.  But no worries, Mariners&#039; pitchers have better batting averages than the fielders anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Shoreline Management Act (RCW 90.58) defines &#8220;master program&#8221; to include not only the plan, but also the &#8220;use regulations&#8221; adopted to implement said plan, See RCW 90.58.030(3)(b).</p>
<p>If the Shoreline Master Plan specifically refers to the CAO for buffer regulations, then presumably the CAO serves as a &#8220;use regulation&#8221; to the SMP.  Therefore, the shoreline buffers found in the CAO are effectively a part of the SMP and the Court&#8217;s decision has no effect on the County&#8217;s shoreline buffer regulations.</p>
<p>Or, in baseball language, the Designated Hitter rule applies only in American League ballparks.  But no worries, Mariners&#8217; pitchers have better batting averages than the fielders anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mick</title>
		<link>http://pugetsoundblogs.com/waterways/2008/08/02/good-luck-untangling-shoreline-rules-after-court-ruling/comment-page-1/#comment-1074</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 22:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pugetsoundblogs.com/waterways/?p=717#comment-1074</guid>
		<description>ask me to name the 68 Yankees and i will sound intelligent .

So the court is basically saying local communitie legislating districts can not set up their own buffer zones when it comes to shoreline boundries ?

What happens if their is circumstances that all of us would agree was a bad idea not to do so in certain areas . 
Looks to me extreme envirnomental positions by certain counties  by making one buffer fit all areas have caused such a back lash that it may hurt the envirnoment more so because of throwing out the baby with the bath water .  
.

Explain in baseball language someone please .

.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ask me to name the 68 Yankees and i will sound intelligent .</p>
<p>So the court is basically saying local communitie legislating districts can not set up their own buffer zones when it comes to shoreline boundries ?</p>
<p>What happens if their is circumstances that all of us would agree was a bad idea not to do so in certain areas .<br />
Looks to me extreme envirnomental positions by certain counties  by making one buffer fit all areas have caused such a back lash that it may hurt the envirnoment more so because of throwing out the baby with the bath water .<br />
.</p>
<p>Explain in baseball language someone please .</p>
<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
