You’ll have read in today’s Kitsap Sun that the county’s
projected sales tax revenues are lower than expected.
According to the story by Steve Gardner:
“Revenues came in $600,000 less than expected for the year, even
after the county had trimmed its original budget expectations by
$2.8 million.”
Ouch.
The county is in good (?) company. Gardner writes:
“On Bainbridge Island, the city learned last week that
permitting fee revenues were dramatically less than expected for
the end of the year.
In Bremerton, the city closed its offices to the public on
Fridays, in part to deal with a $4.4 million budget hole there.
Poulsbo came in $1
million short after 2008. Steve Gardner just informed me
(1:30 p.m.) that he heard from the city of Poulsbo an update that
this city also came in about where they expected for
revenue.
Port Orchard was
the only city to come close to its original budget.”
Port Orchard and Poulsbo both came in close to their original
budgets.
When asked if Port Orchard was feeling the other cities’ budget
pain, City Treasurer Kris Tompkins e-mailed me:
“We came into 2009 pretty close to budgeted beginning cash
balances. We will be watching revenues (and expenditures) closely
each month, particularly sales tax collections. I will be briefing
the Mayor and
Finance Committee regularly so we can adjust if necessary.
As you know we tend to budget conservatively here.”
I can testify to this. I don’t live within city limits, but we
get our water and sewer from Port Orchard. I can remember a time
(definitely less than five years ago, possibly less than three)
that the city did not provide return envelopes with its bills. I
have jokingly said they charge by the sheet for toilet paper if you
want to use the restroom at City Hall. It’s not true, but it
reflects the mentality of at least the last 20 years, which is at
least how long Tomkins has been with the city. In all probability
she will continue to keep the city council on a short leash to
extent her job description allows.
Gardner and I were talking about this yesterday evening. Playing
devil’s advocate, Steve asked if budgeting conservatively is being
straight up with constituents. After all, it boils down to
underestimating revenues and overestimating expenses. City
officials who budget spot on get dinged in an economy like this,
where nasty surprises are the order of the day.
South Kitsap School District does the same thing as Port
Orchard. The district reported a $2.9 million budget shortfall for
the 2008-2009 school year, but about $2 million of that was what
Terri Patton, assistant superintendent of business and support
services, calls “soft money.” Because the district budgets
conservatively, they ended up ahead by about $1 million at the end
of the last school year. They used $470,000 for the district’s
needs, reducing the fund balance below the targeted 3+ percent.
They used $250,000 of their “contingency fund” (savings account for
emergencies), and they had $184,000 in “carry over.” According to
Patton, “We made real cuts of $900,000.”
So, playing the devil’s advocate, I would ask, “Is this playing
the shell game with the public’s money or responsible stewardship
of same? How does a public entity strike the balance between
providing for the constituents’ needs and providing for a rainy
day?”
(Let it be noted that both PO and SKSD, like all other
jurisdictions, invest any excess funds to generate additional
revenue. According to Patton, their cushion will be depleted by the
2009-2010 school year, and they’ll be looking at “real cuts of $3
to $5 million.)