On Sunday, we’ll run a story on the latest developments in the debate over Port Orchard Mayor Lary Coppola’s salary. At issue has been whether and how to compensate him on his performance of the job. Here’s a brief review of our coverage and preview of the story.
Coverage so far:
The council in 2008 agreed to what they believed was a
six-month trial increase for Coppola, who welcomed the idea of
a
pay-for-performance model. But the council learned in June that
what they thought was a temporary measure could not be
undone.
Under state law, councils can raise a mayor’s salary part-way
through his term of office, City Attorney Greg Jacoby told them,
but unless there were a financial crisis,
they could not decrease it until the position came open again.
Coppola’s term is up at the end of 2011.
Finance Committee Chairman John Clauson said the council did not
ask Jacoby to research the implications of their action back in
December, which led to the unintended consequence of a permanent
raise.
Recent developments:
Coppola has volunteered to give up 50 percent of his salary if he
doesn’t meet a set of quantifiable standards to be set by the city
council. Under a proposal from Finance Committee Chairman John
Clauson, the committee will draft the list of measurable criteria,
to be finalized by the city council. A new set of criteria would be
developed and Coppola would be evaluated every six months. If he
doesn’t meet the standard, he would accept a 50 percent decrease in
his current rate ($62,150 annually).
At least one other Washington city has an incentive-pay
arrangement with its mayor. Leavenworth Mayor Rob Eaton receives a
base compensation of $12,000, but under an ordinance passed by the
city council in July, 2008, the council may periodically, at its
discretion grant him what amounts to bonus compensation. Over the
past year, Eaton has received a total of $60,000.
Like Coppola, Eaton spends more than 40 hours a week promoting his
city. His forte is lobbying state and federal legislators. Often,
when his work day is done, Eaton attends festivities in the quaint,
Bavarian-themed town in Eastern Washington.
Leavenworth, with a population of 2,200 receives more than 2
million visitors a year. They have both a mayor and a city
administrator.
Not everyone on Port Orchard’s council is on board with the idea of incentive pay for the mayor. Although Councilman Fred Chang calls Coppola’s offer “admirable,” he finds Clauson’s proposal “disturbing.”
“I think it’s unnecessarily politicizing the position,” said Chang, who with Councilman Fred Olin unsuccessfully sought an advisory vote on the issue early in the discussion. “I’m very disturbed by the performance-based model. I like it in principal, but I think they’re forgetting we’re a government, not a private company.”
Both Chang and Olin have had good things to say about Coppola, and they agree Port Orchard needs a full-time mayor. But they disagree with the methods pursued by the council.
On a separate note, Port Orchard — which has
long had a bad case of Leavenworth envy — has not gone
unnoticed by that town.
“I’m very familiar with your community,” said Eaton. I think it’s a
beautiful community. I think it has lots of opportunities. I find
it charming.”
Although Leavenworth’s unifying theme has played to its advantage, it’s not a deal breaker, Eaton said. His town’s events are a surprisingly “mixed bag,” just like Port Orchard which touts seagulls one week, pirates another, and recently pulled out all the stops to turn itself into the fictional town of Cedar Cove. “The ultimate thing is your customers,” said Eaton. “If you treat your guests well, they’ll come back.”