Before I address annexation, I’ll call your attention to a meeting at 7 p.m. Wednesday at the McCormick Woods Clubhouse in which Doug Skrobut of McCormick Land Company will give an update on McCormick West. This is the last part of the urban growth area known as McCormick Urban Village to be developed. It is still in the permitting stage, and, according to Skrobut, construction will not start any time soon.
Here is a map created for the City of Port Orchard by the county’s Department of Information Services. I have altered the map to highlight the McCormick West boundaries. Download file
If you’ll recall, McCormick West was not included in the proposed boundaries for annexation of McCormick Woods into the City of Port Orchard (the boundary does include The Ridge at McCormick Woods, north of Old Clifton Road). This was done at Skrobut’s request because his company has been working with the county on multiple agreements regarding development of McCormick West. If McWest are were to become part of the city, all those agreements would have to be renegotiated and the permitting process would essentially have to start over, Skrobut said.
Now to the issue of annexation:
Pasted below is the most recent newsletter from McCormick Woods Annexation Committee member Ray McGovern (dated March 10).
McGovern addresses the perception that McCormick Woods is a “cash cow” to the City of Port Orchard, with a reply from Mayor Lary Coppola. McGovern also explains the reason for the delay in his committee filing the preliminary petition that will put annexation on the table for the city council to consider.
ANNEXATION NEWSLETTER #9
This issue is not a pro or con on annexation. It is an attempt to clarify some misunderstandings about why the City of Port Orchard wants us to annex. A number of residents emailed me or voiced their opinion that the only reason Port Orchard wants our area is to get into our wallets, raise our taxes and/or use us as a “cash cow”. These questions were asked of the mayor and the following is, in part, his reply.
….”The City’s main source of revenue is from sales tax – NOT property taxes. The City will collect the same percentage of property tax from the McCormick Wood’s area as we do everywhere else in the city, and that is basically a break-even proposition when the cost of providing City services is factored in. In other words, it ISN’T about the money for the City, because it’s a basically a revenue-neutral situation. If taxation was an issue, after annexation the McCormick Woods area will have a louder voice as City residents than as County ones”….. (end of reply)
My note: I’ll be interested to see if the income versus outflow of revenue for McWoods actually turns out to be a “break-even” proposition. I suspect it will have to do with how high maintenance McWoods turns out to be.
Back to Ray:
Another often asked question is “why is the process taking so long?” The city asked us for time before submitting the annexation petition so they could discuss the process with and get information from Kitsap County; which has taken much longer than the city anticipated. Your Annexation Committee will continue to work with the mayor, city staff and with County officials to try and get answers which we will report on in future Newsletters and the progress to date. We are reserving our “pro’s & con’s” information till we have factual answers, as this exploratory process is taking longer than your committee expected.
This Annexation Newsletter is not an attempted to change anyone’s mind on annexation. It is only to clarify questions. The purpose of your Annexation Committee is to gather and disseminate factual information. If or when you get to vote on annexation the decision will be yours, not the Committees.
For the Annexation Committee;
Ray McGovern, Mcgovern96@wavecable.com