Category Archives: What Runs Downhill

Vacancy on board of Manchester H2O District

The Manchester Water District is seeking applicants to fill the unexpired term of a commissioner who is moving out of the district and will be ineligible to serve the rest of his term.

Kyle Galpin, who has served on the district’s board since 2000, announced his resignation this month, said Dennis O’Connell, general manager.

Galpin was selected to replace outgoing Commissioner Jacki Masters in July 2000. He was elected to office in 2001, and re-elected in 2003 and 2009.

“In his nearly 14-years of service as commissioner, Kyle helped guide the district through two management changes, critical infrastructure improvements, and an occasional billing dispute,” said O’Connell. “His experience in the water utility industry as an employee of West Sound Utility District made him uniquely qualified to address matters of concern for Manchester Water District, and we’ll miss his expertise, sound judgment, and good humor.”

The other two commissioners and district staff are grateful for Galpin’s service and “wish him the best in his future endeavors,” O’Connell said.

Manchester residents who live within water district boundaries are eligible for appointment to the vacant position. Meetings are held at 5:30 p.m. the second Tuesday of each month in the Manchester Library and are open to the public.

Letters of interest, due by April 15, should be mailed to board Chairman Steve Pedersen, Manchester Water District, P.O. Box 98, Manchester, WA 98353.

See options for Manchester’s “Stormwater Park” Tuesday

Kitsap County public works officials on Tuesday will present design options for a public park, to be located on county property with a new stormwater treatment plant.
The plant, to be built in 2014 and 2015, will add high-capacity stormwater treatment for the Manchester area and create a new community commons at the intersection of Colchester Drive and Main Street.
“Hearing from people about their needs and preferences for community amenities will help us to move to the next phase of project design,” said Chris May, Kitsap County Surface and Stormwater Management Program Manager. “The county is interested in designing features that will enhance the community and support the area’s stormwater treatment needs.”
For more information, visit http://www.kitsapgov.com/sswm/Manchester_SW_Retrofit.htm.
The meeting is 6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. Tuesday at the Manchester Library. I’ll see you there.

Chris Henry, South Kitsap reporter

Everything you ever wanted to know about that nasty odor in McCormick Woods

Port Orchard public works officials on Wednesday will answer questions about a major, long-term capital project to replace degrading septic systems within McCormick Woods.

A meeting is set for 6 p.m., with a second meeting at 6 p.m. Feb. 5, both at city hall, 216 Prospect Street.

The development’s 605 poorly functioning septic systems use hybrid technology. The “STEP” tanks — for septic tank effluent pumping systems — draw off liquid effluent to the city sewer line. Solids remain in the tank.

The STEP systems were approved for lots too small for regular septic systems by Kitsap County in the 1980s, when McCormick Woods was in the planning stages. Because of how the system works, decomposition of waste starts in the tank, causing strong hydrogen sulfide odors and corrosion at the pump station. Corrosion from the STEP systems threatens the integrity of sewer lines and equipment throughout the city, Public Works Director Mark Dorsey has said.

The city will swap out all “STEP” systems within the development over the next several years. Replacement of the septics has been on the city’s capital sewer projects plan since 2010 and will be paid for out of a sewer rate hike implemented that year.

The need to replace the STEP tanks has nothing to do with the city’s 2009 annexation of McCormick Woods. The city inherited maintenance of the STEP systems from Kitsap County in 1994, when a community drain field was replaced by a sewer line jointly owned by Port Orchard and what is now West Sound Utility District.

The STEP systems’ malfunction also had nothing to do with a sewer and water rate increase in 2009, shortly after the annexation. Before becoming part of the city, McCormick Woods was subject to a 50 percent surcharge on sewer and water services provided by the city. Once the annexation was complete, the surcharge went away, and the entire city — including McCormick Woods residents — had to absorb the loss of revenue.

For more information, contact public works at (360) 876-4991.

Not that Horstman Heights development

Note: The hearing has been rescheduled to Nov. 1, same time and place.

The public can testify on a proposed development on Horstman Road at 10 a.m. Thursday.
The Kitsap County Hearing Examiner will consider plans by Sound Developers Group of Tacoma to build a 36-lot subdivision on 4.5 acres at 4217 SE Horstman Road. Developers are seeking preliminary plat approval for the property, which is zoned urban low.
According to planner Jeff Smith, the project should not be confused with a stalled development to west near the intersection of Horstman and Olney Avenue. The Horstman Heights project, originally owned by David Alan Development LLC, was for 54 home lots on 11 acres, but no homes were ever built there. Improper site development caused runoff from the property, resulting in a fine from the Department of Ecology in 2009. The property went into foreclosure and was repossessed by Whidbey Island Bank in July.
Smith said he encouraged Sound Developers to change the name of their project from Horstman Preliminary Plat to Prosperity Preliminary Plat to avoid confusion.
Files on the Prosperity development are available for inspection by appointment only 10 a.m. through 4 p.m. Monday through Thursday at the county’s Department of Community Development, 619 Division Street, Port Orchard. To make an appointment, call (360) 337-4487.
Written and verbal comments will be accepted at the hearing. For information, contact Karen Ashcraft at (360) 337-4487 or kashcraf@co.kitsap.wa.us.

City eats water bill

The city of Port Orchard is checking its roughly 6,000 water meters for accuracy after settling a dispute with the company that runs McCormick Woods Golf Course.

The city recently agreed to waive $780.16 in water fees that the public works department failed to properly record in 2010 and 2011. The undercharges came to the attention of the city’s utility committee this summer, when golf course manager Shawn Cucciardi attended their August meeting to ask about his bill. For reasons not clear in the staff report, C&M Golf LLC was overcharged by about $60 for water used so far in 2012.

The under-billing errors originated after a fire at the golf course in 2009, a suspected arson that destroyed numerous vehicles and equipment at the cart barn. The golf course requested a “service meter upsizing” with the new meter drop, but the new meter was improperly calibrated on installation.

The city has three types of meters that all look alike, Public Works Director Mark Dorsey explained. Without checking the serial numbers, it is possible for the worker installing the meter to incorrectly calibrate the system, he said. The McCormick Woods meter read the correct amount of water being used, but the correct usage was not picked up by public works employees’ meter reading equipment.

The city undercharged the golf club by $840.52. The utility committee, in its recommendation, subtracted the overcharge of $60.39 to arrive at the $780.16 figure. Chairman Rob Putaansuu said he felt like it was a fair resolution. John Clauson, a committee member, agreed.

“This was an error on our part,” Clauson said. “It took a long time for us to discover this error. … It certainly is our fault. It is the right thing to do.”

Mayor Tim Matthes and Councilman Fred Chang weren’t so sure. Matthes said that the statute of limitations on incorrect bills is six years. “We have the responsibility to capture that,” he said, adding that waiving the fee could set an unwanted precedent.

City Attorney Greg Jacoby corrected the mayor, saying the city has the option to collect, which expires after six years. But the city is not obliged by law to collect the money.

Chang said the amount of water consumed (and its value) was a substantial hit to the utility. “We’re not just your average service oriented company,” he said.

Chang said at the least the city should establish a consistent policy if other under-billings are discovered during the city-wide meter check. (None have been discovered so far.) Other council members agreed on this point but over-rode Chang, who alone voted against waiving the 2010 and 2011 fees.

Check Port Orchard’s water quality on state’s data base

In researching a story on Port Orchard’s water quality, I was introduced to the state Department of Health’s Office of Drinking Water’s database on all systems in the state.

As you’ll read in the story, despite periodic episodes of discolored water in the Tremont Street – Pottery Avenue area, Port Orchard hasn’t had a report that raises any red flags with the state since 2004. That was for coliform bacteria, which a state DOH official explained to me is an “indicator” of possible contamination, calling for follow-up testing. In this case the follow up tests were within normal limits, said Bonnie Waybright of the Office of Drinking Water.

You’ll see a number of tests showing coliform bacteria through the years dating back to 1985, which is the extent of the online data. There are a couple episodes of e coli, including one as recently as 2002. Again, Waybright said, follow up tests showed no contamination with e coli.

My story explains the basics of water testing protocol and precautions taken for various types of contaminants, so I won’t repeat it here.

Linda Waring, DOH spokeswoman, gives the following tips on using the database.

“Port Orchard’s Water System ID is 68900. If you enter this number and leave the other boxes blank, it will pull up their monitoring history. You can also search by name. The tabs you’ll need are labeled “Samples” and “Exceedances.” Samples will give you all of their water quality results. Exceedances will show any samples that exceeded acceptable limits. If you click the sample number next to each test, the link will show you the exact results and the name of the lab that did the test.”

Waring says, “Discolored water is not an unusual complaint. Color and sediment are aesthetic concerns that do not pose a health risk.”

Here’s a link to a fact sheet that discusses color, taste and odor problems in drinking water.

The city’s proposed water rate hike is unrelated to the problems with well 9, which affect a relatively small geographic area and number of homes, said Public Works Director Mark Dorsey.

Contact the city’s public works department at (360) 876-4991 or (360) 876-2722.

Here’s a copy of the state’s certification of the water system.
POh2oOK

The great Port Orchard water rate debate

Discussion of a proposed water rate hike in Port Orchard continued last week (Aug. 9) with a public hearing and sometimes testy testimony.

The council was to have continued discussion of the water rate increase at its Tuesday (today/Aug. 16) study session. But Public Works Director Mark Dorsey said that the deluge of public comment led the city’s utility committee to take a step back and recommend deferral of a vote on the rate hike until September.

Among those who commented on Aug. 9, city council meeting regular Gerry Harmon spoke on her proposal to charge by the gallon instead of the city’s current method of charging a base rate and adding a per gallon consumption charge above 5,000 gallons.

The city has 7 rate tiers. Each tier adds a higher consumption charge per gallon for the amount of water used above the tier threshold. That charge is added to base rate plus the maximum charge for the previous tier.

City officials say the utility must charge a base rate (currently $22.50 per month), because of the cost just to have the system up and running (no pun intended). In other words, it costs the city $22.50 to deliver even one gallon of water.

Harmon’s calculations were hypothetical, as if the city were to impose the rate increase. The city, in its response to Harmon, used current rates and its most recently audited data back to 2009. Treasurer Allan Martin said the city by law must deal in absolute numbers, not hypotheticals when making projections.

Both parties showed that indeed the price per gallon goes down the more water that’s used. Harmon’s calculations show the price per gallon leveling out at about 144,000 gallons. The city’s price per gallon leveled out after 133,000 gallons and increased slightly at 150,001+ gallons before leveling out again.

City officials, including Martin, met with Harmon before the public hearing to show their calculations and conclusions in response to Harmon’s question, “Wouldn’t it be more fair to charge a straight per gallon on cost?”

Harmon contends that the current system rewards high volume users, but there is no incentive for people like herself, who actively conserve water.

Of high volume users, she said, “Even though they have a higher water bill, they’re getting their water for less per gallon than the other people. To me it says use it right up to your limit.”

The propose rate hike does offer a discount to people who use less than 3,000 gallons per month. But there is no conservation incentive throughout the 7 tiers.

Martin, in a memo to Harmon and the city’s utility committee, outlines three possible methods for promoting conservation:
-> An increasing block rate, with the users in the first block charged at one rate, the users in the second block charged more and so on
-> High use surcharges, essentially a punishment for higher than average water use
-> Seasonal rates, in which prices rise and fall according to water demand and weather conditions

But Martin said any city must be careful with conservation incentive programs. Generally, the higher volume users have more ways and more leeway to conserve water, while residential users’ needs — based on number of people in the household and other relatively fixed factors — don’t have a lot of wiggle room. Conservation programs actually could have the unintended consequence of placing more of the burden on residential users, Martin said.

Utilities, like water, sewer and stormwater, by law must be run as separate funds from the city’s (or county’s) general fund, and they must be self-sustaining. Revenue from the utility must support delivery of the service without subsidy. So the city is limited in how much it can alter rates without running in the red, Martin said. The city’s water service has been running in the red, utility committee members say, and the purpose of the rate hike is to get back in the black.

The city has a rate formula designed so that each group of users (residential, commercial, city, other government, churches and irrigation) bears its proportionate share of the cost to run the whole utility. The percentages fluctuate a few points either way, from year to year, Martin said, but generally the formula works out.

In 2010, residential users, who as a group consumed just more than 67 percent of the water, paid nearly 69.5 per cent of the total cost. In 2009, however, the group used nearly 69.6 percent of the water and paid just more than 59 percent of the total revenue to the water fund.

In 2010, commercial users consumed 19.72 percent of the water and paid 18.82 percent of the revenue; in 2009, they consumed 18.90 and paid 21.07.

Harmon said she was frustrated that it took this long to get the city to actually run the numbers, and she doesn’t buy the thing about the hypotheticals. She’d like to see the city’s calculations using figures proposed by the utility committee.

Those figures could change, and if the committee’s move back-to-the drawing board is any indication, they are likely to do so.

Return of Manchester Mudslide, The Movie

Last night, I covered a meeting between county officials and Manchester residents on stormwater management. The county is planning to install “green” techniques like rain gardens, bioswales and pervious pavement in strategic locations around town.

Manchester is notorious for is mid-winter flooding. The town, on Puget Sound, sits at the bottom of a hillside. The water table is high and the soil in many places nonporous. Manchester may as well be at the bottom of a bowl. When winter rains hit, resident Dave Denniston thinks about going white water rafting.

All kidding aside, flooding in Manchester is a chronic problem. I reported on an appeal back in 2007 related to a 2006 mudslide that threatened properties downhill. The county took a video of the slide in action the day after heavy rains that kicked it off. The video was shown as part of a hearing on the appeal before the hearing examiner.

I found the video riveting and still get a kick out of watching it, especially seeing two county employees, uttering in amazement, jump back from the brink as another chunk of mud falls into a 15 foot ravine. So now, back by popular demand … Manchester Mudslide, The Movie.






Mudslide on 166 causes delays (and thoughts of highway’s name)

12:15 a.m. today (Monday, March 14): Plans for delays if you’re heading to or from Port Orchard on Highway 166 (that highway that goes along Beach Drive). Washington State Department of Transportation notified us at 11:55 a.m. of the slide in the eastbound lane at milepost 1.2. WSDOT Maintence is on the scene. One-way, alternating traffic has been established in the westbound lane.

Despite the rainy weather we’ve had this winter, the hillside above the highway, which received a major fix from WSDOT, has held pretty well … until now.

The news prompted talk in the newsroom of whether there’s a name for the highway, other than Highway 166 or “that road that goes along the water heading into Port Orchard.” What do you call that road (other than a few choice names when mudslides happen)?

Party on FB for the Late Etta Turner to Raise Funds for Latrines

I never met Etta Turner, but I suspect she would have loved to celebrate her 25th birthday with a party centered on latrines.

Etta, a Rotary exchange student and Port Orchard resident, was killed at age 16 in a bus accident in Bolivia. Her mother Pennye Nixon-West founded Etta Projects in her daughter’s memory.

The non-profit organization helps residents of the Bolivian town that became Etta’s second home. Projects are aimed to improve the quality of life especially for children, not just put a Band-aid on it.

“No somos un proyecto de caridad. La comunidad y Proyecto Etta creamos oportunidades,” Nixon-West and Etta’s friends say. “We’re not a charity. We’re co-creators of opportunity.”

Etta, during her stay in Bolivia, showed herself fiercely dedicated to social justice. Etta Projects‘ latest effort seeks to provide areas without proper bathroom facilities with safe and ecologically sound latrines at a cost of about $500 a pop.

Pennye forwarded me a letter from some of Etta’s friends who are hosting a party for her on Facebook and seeking donations for the latrines, “because everyone deserves a private, clean and safe pooper.”

Here’s the letter:
Hola from Britta and Cody (Etta’s childhood friends)!

We are celebrating Etta’s 25th birthday – by throwing her a party of $25 donations to Etta Projects!!! Everyone’s invited! We need your help – we miss our friend and this is one way we can honor her. Your kind contribution would be the perfect birthday gift to help Etta look out for the people in Bolivia.

As some of you may already know, this Tuesday, January 25th will be Etta’s Quarter of a Century Birthday. In honor of her birthday we’d like to invite everyone to participate in the second annual Etta’s Birthday fundraiser. It’s simple, every year on Etta’s birthday we want to try and get as many people as we can to donate money to her cause.

This year we want to encourage everyone to help out with the ecological bathroom project! The “bathroom” situation down there is shitty and they need our help! We need to get them ecological bathrooms! That means a waterless toilet that provides a safe, nonpolluting and cost effective solution to sanitation problems. A bathroom (which includes construction materials, labor, health education and promotion, project administration and monitoring & evaluation) costs $498.14… We hope that our participation and support for Etta’s Birthday this year can help many families get the bathroom that they need.

Thank you for your help! Thank you for giving a crap about their crappy bathroom conditions and the need to do something about it!

Cheers to Etta!

How to donate: http://www.ettaprojects.org/donate.aspx
When: Week of January 25th

To see more about the ecological composting latrines Etta Projects facebook page has a description and diagram http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Etta-Projects-Proyectos-Etta/103559636703 We will soon have a whole page on our website.

Thank you and please consider celebrating with a $25 donation because everyone deserves a private, clean and safe pooper.
Remove my name from all future email correspondence

Address postal inquiries to:
Etta Projects
13624 Vintage Drive SW
Port Orchard, WA 98367
Powered By