Peninsular Thinking

A conversation about Bremerton, Port Orchard, Poulsbo, Silverdale, Bainbridge Island, Kingston, Manchester, Seabeck, Southworth, Suquamish, Belfair, Keyport, Olalla, Bangor, Hansville, Indianola, Port Gamble, Allyn, Port Ludlow, Gig Harbor and every once in a while something about the good folks who don't have the good fortune to live here.
Subscribe to RSS

Kingston Buccaneers’ Game On at Home

August 20th, 2013 by Steven Gardner

This can continue in this very place. | Kitsap Sun file photo by Carolyn J. Yaschur

Kitsap County’s Department of Community Development issued an administrative revision that paves the way for Kingston High School to get a press box at its football field. The North Kitsap School District applied for a conditional use permit to host home games on campus and to add a press box. The county’s approval lends credibility to the idea that this is Kingston High’s home field for good. A building permit is next, barring appeal of the permit just approved.

While community support in Kingston has been high for home games, support is not universal throughout the district. NK Education, a group of North Kitsap adults interested in the education of their kids, gathered written comments about the field. There were lots, by far the majority, of people opposed who said spending $30,000 to match Kingston boosters’ contribution is too much at a time when the district is cutting elsewhere.

And there were those who said the field was never intended to be a place for games. Among those was former school board member Ed Strickland, who was on the board from 2003-2011. He wrote:

“This is what I remember:

“The area we had to work with was very limited. To even get a football field where we put it we had to get some kind of permission to use park land for some of the field. I think this is on the north east side of the field. There is a problem with the east side of the field in that it is on a hill side that could have a problem supporting that side of the field.

“We also had a problem with enough parking for the school. To solve this the field was considered a practice field in the permit process. After this was done we purchased the property to the south of the Spectrum site, so this could be added for parking at a later date.

“In the building of the field, I had Robin, with the Board approval, put in conduit for lights on the field. We also were able to add the artificial surface with some money saved from other parts of the construction. We really had to do this as we were getting artificial turf at the Poulsbo facility. The community raised some of the money for the lights as they were needed for a practice field.

“If we had thought that this was going to be a field for large crowds we would have put in the infrastructure for bathrooms and handicapped access for crowds. This we did not do as we never had the idea that we would not use the Poulsbo facility for games.
The lights were a real problem and the Board really messed up in not putting them in in the first place. This brought the community together in such a way that they supported playing football games at the field. Even though you have no stands to see a game and no way for the Band to have the crowd see their marching, both the Band and football parents put up with this and play their games at this field. There is no place for handicapped or restricted seniors to see a game at this facility.

“If you look at the site, you will see lots of infrastructure for storm water. Adding the stands that this field needs for proper use will require that this problem be evaluated.

“The community needs to be involved in the process of changing this practice field to a game field for spectators. The costs are going to be large. The parking and handicapped facilities will run the project into seven digits if it is done legally. The deed for the park may also be a problem. You can share my thoughts with anyone as most of this is part of the Board record. I voted against the design plan for the school and the field as I could see that where the field was placed was not very well planned.

“Ed Strickland, NK School Board, 2003-2011″

Residents brought up issues to the county about safety of the press box, traffic, stormwater, noise and light and other issues. The chief stumbling block to those who oppose this game use is the county’s opinion that the 2004 conditional use permit “does not limit the field’s use.” The county sees game use and a press box as a minor revision. The use and the press box fall within the bounds set by the previous environmental impact statement, according to the county.

The county has no say, of course, on the wisdom of the school board committing $30,000 toward the press box.

Another argument is that few districts elsewhere have more than one football field. Indeed the Central Kitsap School District’s three high schools all consider a field next to Olympic High School as their home football field. While true, you only need to go to Bellevue to find a school district with four high schools and four football stadiums. Sure, Bellevue is different from North Kitsap. But they have their reasons. North Kitsap and Kingston have theirs.

For all who might want to go back to what the district intended when it built Kingston, that is to not have Kingston play its home games on campus, it could very well be too late for that. Strickland might be the most correct in answering why. “The lights were a real problem and the Board really messed up in not putting them in in the first place. This brought the community together in such a way that they supported playing football games at the field,” he wrote. Once the district let the Kingston boosters raise enough money to put in lights, a huge improvement for that field, there was no way to tell them “no” anymore. The community had invested too much of its own labor, lucre and love to turn it down. Had the district put in the lights from the beginning there would have been little else around which the community could rally, nothing that would have generated as much enthusiasm.

Additionally, if the district had worked even before Kingston opened to alter the stadium at North Kitsap to be a home field for two teams, the anger that led to the lights in Kingston might never have happened either. In Central Kitsap that stadium is near Olympic High School, but it’s Silverdale Stadium, not Olympic.

It’s all Monday-morning quarterbacking now.

Tags: , ,

Email This Post Email This Post Print This Post Print This Post

5 Responses to “Kingston Buccaneers’ Game On at Home”

  1. Shake Rat Says:

    I’m certainly glad to hear that home games will be at home. Also glad to hear that the press box may be moving forward. I was tired of putting up scaffolding, only to see it come down, unused! Who builds a football field and then does not use it for games? Where I went to school, ALL the schools had their own fields with grandstands, bathrooms, etc. Kingston community deserves a field of our own as witnessed by the support that has been shown. Go Bucs!

  2. Steven Gardner Says:

    @Shake Rat,

    I’ll only address one issue in your comment, something I addressed in the main post. In districts with more than one school it is the norm for them to share a stadium, even if every team has a field. In CK all three high schools have football fields, but they play their games at Silverdale Stadium. In Seattle many schools shared Memorial Stadium as a home field. That is the norm. Bellevue, and now North Kitsap, are exceptions to the rule.

    Stadiums are expensive, and football is the only outdoor sport that creates enough demand to build one. Basketball draws crowds, but gymnasiums are used so regularly it probably makes sense to build one at every school.

    Steven Gardner
    Peninsular Thinking

  3. Mick Sheldon Says:

    I think part of the problem is the Bond used to build the school was not an easy sell . Also the site was seen as less then many thought was adequate in the way the land allowed for building . Remember it was a NIke site also , claims of Hazardous materials still there were made also . Ed Strickland speaks to this somewhat in his comments here .

    But also when selling the idea of building the school on these grounds school board members were not as vocal on the sites problems . People I believe assumed some things that were not discussed, such that sports was going to be able to be supported .

    I think the bottom line is the financial problems that NK faces is causing the disagreements on what money is spent on what to be intensified . I do think its a good thing for schools to have their own football field host their games , but since there are so many other needs that many call basic education that appear to be not met it sure is a hard call .

    As Steve says , its all Monday Morning Quarterbacking now .

  4. J.W. Nannery Says:

    The community of Kingston longs to create it own identity, seperate and distinct from our neighbors to the west. Where better to cultivate and nurture that sense of community identity than through our local high school.

    There were several of us who petitioned the board during the early discussions on what type of facility KHS was to become to included sports and other “after school” activitles on their design plans. The first draft was to be a “school in the woods” learning center with no sports, drama, or music capabilities. The Kingston community rose up and insisted we approved a bond got a “high school”. This press box and field usage is just a continuation of that desire. I think it is a good thing and future generations will thank us for the investment.

  5. David Billings Says:

    Absolutely irresponsible spending by the board at at time of so many cuts. Building a press box? If the community at large really understood just how bad the school board is gutting needed educational classes this year, they would be EMBARRASSED to be voicing their support for capital expenses like this. Especially when sharing is the norm, sharing was the plan and the facility is poorly equipped to be a home field without hundreds of thousands of dollars bing spent over the next decade to bring it up to standards. The board themselves are not predicting the kind of fantastic financial times that would create this cash.
    Does the community realize that the north Kitsap School board and Superintendent have cut Debate, cut creative writing, cut foreign language, cut parent assisted learning, cut gifted programs, cut art, cut american sign language, and are methodically dismantling the music program? Weather a member of the public or the school board, your priorities are home football games over a good education for our children if you support this plan.
    Time for more change at the school board.

Leave a Reply

Before you post, please complete the prompt below.

Enter the word yellow here:

Super Bowl XLIX

Archives