By Susan Gilbert, 40-year League member
LWV of Berrien and Cass Counties, Michigan
It is not uncommon for outsiders, and even some members, to
question how the
League can be nonpartisan yet advocate on positions that, in the
slice of time
that is now, appear to be partisan. In the highly partisan climate
that has
developed in recent years, the League is one of the very few
political
organizations that is not in either the liberal/Democratic camp or
the
conservative/Republican camp. And we have members of all
political
persuasions and encourage them to get involved in politics. So
members may be
partisan but the organization is not. All this is hard for many to
wrap their
minds around.
The League is nonpartisan in that we do not endorse or support
any political
party or candidate for office. We don’t rate legislators, we don’t
track
their votes and we don’t threaten them if they don’t vote our way.
Voter
service is one of our main missions, and we hold candidate forums
to help voters
educate themselves beyond TV ads. Education is an important League
function,
and we try in our meetings to inform our attendees and stimulate
them to think
about issues in our world.
However, the League is also an advocacy group, and we have
positions on issues
that have been developed over the years since our founding in 1920
and are the
result of study and consensus of the local Leagues nationwide.
These
positions are updated from time to time, but are basically
consistent. The
positions and platforms of the political parties, on the other
hand, do change
and at times they resemble our League position, or not. But the
League
doesn’t change or drop its positions because they are currently
those of one
party or the other. And we do speak out!
An example is health care. The League has a position on
comprehensive health
care for all Americans. President Truman liked that idea too and
President
Eisenhower delivered a special message to Congress on January 31,
1955
recommending a comprehensive health program for Americans. Lyndon
Johnson
got Medicare passed and that took the pressure off for a while. But
President Nixon
encouraged HMOs as a way to rein in costs and provide health care
for more people.
Then President Reagan came along and decided the free market was
the best way to
manage health care and the Republicans have basically supported
this idea since.
But clearly both parties have been on both sides of the issue.
The key is not to confuse politics with position advocacy.
Share on Facebook
Recent Comments