Warning: constant() [
function.constant]: Couldn't find constant TT_TH8US_LEN in
/home/psblogs/public_html/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/tweet-this.php on line
1821
Warning: constant() [
function.constant]: Couldn't find constant TT_TH8US_LEN in
/home/psblogs/public_html/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/tweet-this.php on line
1821
Warning: constant() [
function.constant]: Couldn't find constant TT_TH8US_LEN in
/home/psblogs/public_html/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/tweet-this.php on line
1821
Warning: constant() [
function.constant]: Couldn't find constant TT_TH8US_LEN in
/home/psblogs/public_html/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/tweet-this.php on line
1821
Warning: constant() [
function.constant]: Couldn't find constant TT_TH8US_LEN in
/home/psblogs/public_html/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/tweet-this.php on line
1821
Washington was not named a finalist in the competition for the
$3.4 billion in Race to the Top funds. According to an AP story,
the state’s chances were hurt by the lack of charter schools.
This press release from the League of Education Voters arrived
today:
Education advocates urge leaders to develop a robust plan to
help all students succeed
SEATTLE – Parents and education advocates were disappointed to
learn today that Washington State was not selected as a finalist in
the second round of Race to the Top. In June, the state submitted
an application to win $250 million in federal funding for education
reform and innovation with the support of 265 school districts.
“While we’ve made progress, today’s announcement underscores the
fact that Washington still has a lot of work to do to be
competitive in the U.S.—let alone the rest of the world,” said
Chris Korsmo, executive director of the League of Education
Voters.
“Our kids need and deserve a world class education to be
competitive in today’s global marketplace,” Korsmo said. “Right
now, we’re coming up short. We need a robust plan to ensure our
kids receive the rigor and support they need to get into and
through college, and to help catch up the students who are
behind.”
“Despite the disappointing news, this Race to the Top
competition has leveraged more change than we would have thought
possible,” said Lisa Macfarlane, co-founder of the League of
Education Voters. “We passed important education reforms this year,
but that’s just the first step. Now, our state’s leaders must work
together with the districts and unions to achieve real changes that
will transform our schools and help all of our students
succeed.”
In 2010, state lawmakers approved legislation to improve
Washington’s ability to win a portion of President Obama’s $4.3
billion federal Race to the Top fund for education reform and
innovation, such as:
· Authority to intervene in our lowest performing schools;
· A new teacher and principal evaluation system;
· Additional pathways for professionals to become teachers;
and
· Extending teacher tenure from two years to three.
Here’s a bit more (from a South Caroline TV station blog) about
the states that did make the cut:
South Carolina is a finalist in the second round of national
competition for federal Race to the Top grants, U.S. Secretary of
Education Arne Duncan announced Tuesday.
National observers had been predicting South Carolina’s
selection because of the state’s strong showing in Round 1, which
saw only two winners: Delaware and Tennessee. South Carolina
finished sixth in Round 1 voting.
Duncan named 19 Round 2 finalists during a speech at the
National Press Club, saying that judges selected them as having
“the boldest plans” for reform. They are Arizona, California,
Colorado, the District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii,
Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey,
New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and
South Carolina. They earned the highest scores from reviewers who
rated their commitments to improve teacher effectiveness, data
systems, academic standards, and low-performing schools.
Thirty-five states and the District of Columbia submitted
applications.
The list of finalists is supposed to reflect Duncan’s promise
that he would set high standards for the federal education-reform
competition, which has become one of the Obama administration’s
most high-profile policy levers.
At stake is $3.4 billion from the economic stimulus package
approved by Congress last year, not to mention bragging rights.
South Carolina’s application is for about $175 million.
“It’s gratifying but not surprising,” State Superintendent of
Education Jim Rex said of today’s announcement. “Our performance in
Round 1 was a pretty strong hint that we would be a factor in Round
2. Today’s announcement validates, once again, that South Carolina
is viewed as being on the cutting edge of making the changes that
will make schools stronger.”
Finalists will send teams to Washington the week of August 9 to
make presentations to judges, who will then adjust states’ final
grades based on how well they answer detailed questions about their
applications.
Winners will be announced in late August or September.
Applications will be scored on a 500-point scale, with more than
half of those points assigned to initiatives already in place. The
remaining points go to states’ plans for the future. Rex said South
Carolina has a number of programs that should earn it points, such
as a statewide system for evaluating teachers, high academic
standards for students, a system to roll those out to teachers and
a pilot project that links teacher effectiveness to their college
alma maters.
“Ultimately, the goal is to create a seamless system that gives
students the knowledge and skills they need to succeed after high
school – whether that means going on to higher education or
directly to good jobs,” Rex said.
Betsy Carpentier is the Deputy State Superintendent of Education
who oversaw South Carolina’s 1,700-page Round 2 application. She
said the biggest change the state would see, if it were to receive
the money, would be a tighter focus on the impact of individual
educators on their students’ achievement. Under the South Carolina
Education Accountability Act of 1998, improvements in student
achievement have been tracked at the state, district, and school
levels. Some federal money would be used to create a system that
measures how much students grow in a year, she said. An effective
teacher would be one who moves a student one grade level and a
highly effective teacher would move students more than that, she
said. Teachers would be evaluated on their students’ performance,
and training and pay would be based on that review.
South Carolina’s proposal also would help train teachers to
implement newly approved “common core” standards in reading and
math; enhance the use of data to improve instruction, including the
ability to deliver student data directly to teachers’ desktops; add
pilot programs aimed at recruiting and retaining teachers,
especially in hard-to-staff rural areas and in academically
struggling schools; develop more extensive alternative
certification paths for principals and teachers, with a focus on
high-poverty schools; and assist struggling middle and high schools
by providing more intensive help to their “feeder” schools.
In addition to the $3.4 billion in Round 2 grant funds, the USDE
also will distribute $350 million to groups of states participating
in a separate competition to create new college and career-ready
assessments. South Carolina is working with two of those groups.
One group is looking at on-line but traditional assessments; the
other is considering online assessments in which individual
students’ tests are modified as they take place in order to create
a more precise picture of student performance.
South Carolina’s efforts also will receive a boost from a
recently announced $15 million federal grant to help the state
develop a statewide longitudinal data system – creating the
foundation for integrating K-12 data systems with early childhood
data systems, other human service systems, postsecondary data
systems and workforce data systems. The expanded data system will
meet federal requirements for collaboration with institutions and
agencies of higher education. It will include new data sources and
quality control and will create a statewide system for teachers and
principals who need information to make immediate decisions about
student learning.
Rex said that even if South Carolina wins a Round 2 award, the
grant funds would be directed at specific initiatives detailed in
the state’s application and could not be used to blunt the impact
of more than $750 million in state budget cuts to public schools
over the past two years.
Email This Post
| 9 Comments »
Scripps Interactive Newspapers Group
Recent Comments