Kitsap Crime and Justice

The Kitsap Sun staff writes about crime and criminal justice issues.
Subscribe to RSS

Public Defense: The Next Steps

May 19th, 2008 by josh farley

Kitsap County’s public defenders had already been bracing for change. Turns out there was more in store than they thought.

Those lawyers, who take on cases for those who can’t afford a lawyer, have seen a sizable drop in their felony case loads in the past year. Lawyers at some firms have even been laid off.

They had already been waiting for the results of the so-called “Jack Hill” report, which calls for the county to pay for a lawyer to provide oversight and quality control for the system.

Here’s another thing to factor in: In 2002, 15 firms received indigent defense cases from the county clerk’s office. Now, 18 have contracts to receive them.

Thus, more lawyers, less cases.

Add to that the looming news of how the county will spend about half-million dollars from the state to “enhance” public defense. There’s an impending possibility of the county bringing public defense in-house, a move that could diminish caseloads further. Kitsap County Clerk David Peterson hired a consultant — Jack Hill, who once ran the Pierce County Office of Public Defense — about $20,000 to find the best way to do that.

Hill’s answer was hiring a lawyer to work in the clerk’s office, one Peterson wants to task with “oversight” and “quality control,” of public defense in Kitsap.

Another task, though, would be to plan for the future of the county’s indigent defense: either keep the status quo, or moved to a more “mixed system” of defense attorneys, some who’d work for private firms, and some who’d work for the county.

They still need final approval from the county commissioners to hire the attorney, Peterson said.

Here’s the good news for public defenders: regardless of what happens, attorneys who handle public defense on a contract basis “aren’t going to go away,” Peterson told me.

Email This Post Email This Post Print This Post Print This Post

One Response to “Public Defense: The Next Steps”

  1. Mick Sheldon Says:

    The victimhood of the legal jobs being portrayed has a basis for some good lawyer jokes . I guess having a profession where everyone in it makes money from crime and personal disaster makes it hard to feel sorry for the guys .

    The real issue is I believe the Prosecutor’s policy of charging for a lesser crime unless the person wants to go to trial . Huagealso came out aginst the tougher child molestation laws , Jessica Plus . I see a connection with this thinking and the results we are seeing .

    They need to lift the bar , not against drug users , but dealers , and especially those who commit violence , steal , identy theft , etc . Those crimes leave problems for the the victim often after the guy is out and free to do another crime .

    Tough on crime may not the answer , but tough on certain crimes helps !

Leave a Reply

Before you post, please complete the prompt below.

Please enter the word MILK here:

Available on Kindle

Polls

Do you support stricter gun laws?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...