Kitsap Crime and Justice

Here’s Chief Mike Lasnier’s statement on the Suquamish shooting:

“Information has been previously released regarding the officer involved shooting incident that occurred in Suquamish last night.  All questions regarding the investigation, its status, or specific facts of the case should be referred to the Public Information Officer for the lead investigating agency, Deputy Scott Wilson of the Kitsap County Sheriff’s Office.

Following the incident, the Suquamish Police Department followed standard law enforcement protocol, and requested assistance from the Kitsap County Sheriff’s Office, and the Washington State Patrol, to ensure a fair and objective investigation into the incident.  Both agencies responded without delay, and have provided assistance to our agency in this matter.  The Suquamish Police Department and its officers are cooperating fully with the investigation.  We are grateful to the Kitsap Sheriff’s Department and Washington State Patrol for their professional response and assistance in this matter.

At approximately 2130 on Saturday evening, officers were dispatched to a report of a disturbance with multiple shots fired on Newton Street in Suquamish.  Upon arriving in the area, officers cautiously approached the residence, and contacted subjects outside of the house.  One subject was a 34 year old career criminal with an extensive history of drug dealing, with 9 prior felony convictions for violent crimes, burglary, drug dealing and possession of drugs, as well as assault and intimidating witnesses.  He also has 12 prior misdemeanor convictions for multiple crimes, including displaying weapons with intent to intimidate.  He currently had a Felony “No Bail” “Caution” warrant for his arrest, for escape from the Washington State Department of Corrections on “community custody” for Drug Charges.  When challenged by 3 officers in full uniform, the offender fled towards his vehicle, and refused commands to stop or show his hands.  The offender entered a vehicle, started it, and rapidly accelerated towards the officers.  One officer was struck by the bumper of the vehicle, and another had his foot run over.  Both officers discharged their weapons, and the wanted, fleeing, dangerous felon was struck by gunfire.  A female passenger also received minor wounds from secondary projectiles.  The suspects fled the scene, went to a nearby residence to seek aid from friends, and got into a different vehicle to seek medical aid.  The suspects realized they needed immediate medical assistance, so they drove to the Suquamish Police Department to seek help.  Aid was obtained for them, and the male subject was flown to Harborview for the treatment of gunshot wounds, the Female passenger transported to Harrison Hospital in Bremerton.

Both officers struck by the suspect car were injured, and were transported by ambulance to Harrison Medical Center for treatment of their wounds.  Both were treated and later released.  After recovering from their injuries, the officers will be on administrative duties, which is standard procedure in incidents of this nature.  Both officers are veterans of the department with over 7 years of service each.

I am confident that the Officers of the Suquamish Police Department acted appropriately in this matter.  We welcome external review of this matter by County, State and Federal Authorities.  Upon completion of the external review, we will be conducting an internal shooting review, which is standard department policy.

I am confident that the choices made by our officers were professional, legal and justified, and that this confidence will be supported following a thorough and exhaustive professional and legal review. My officers had a duty and obligation to respond and act, and they did so with a great deal of courage and professionalism.  Anyone who attacks and attempts to murder police officers, whether with a gun, a knife, or the car used in this incident, should expect that any officer will respond in the same manner.

Additional information can be obtained from the lead investigation agency, the Kitsap County Sheriff’s Department.

Share on Facebook

Tweet This Post 

Share on Facebook

Tweet This Post 

Washington’s roads are once again on par for a record. This morning, I spoke to Lowell Porter, director of the Washington Traffic Safety Commission, who told me that there were 483 traffic deaths in the state in 2009.

That’s still 483 too many, Porter points out. And the finding isn’t yet official. But the 2008 total — 522 — is still much higher. And that number is below the number of traffic deaths that occurred in the state in 1955.

Porter says that the state is meeting its expectations — 25 less traffic deaths per year — in an effort to get to “Target Zero,” or no fatalities, by 2030.

Share on Facebook

Tweet This Post 

Dateline NBC will soon shine a spotlight on one of Bremerton’s most notorious murders.

The news show came to Kitsap for a retrospective look at the killing — and subsequent cover up — of Dawn Hacheney in 1997.

Sue Shultz, Bainbridge police lieutenant who investigated the murder, said that she gave an hour and a half interview to Dateline at her island office earlier this month. Others involved in the investigation also gave interviews, I’m told.

I also got an email from Gregg Olsen, an Olalla author whose new yet to be released book “A Twisted Faith,” chronicles the killing and investigation of Dawn Hackeney’s killer, her husband Nick. Gregg sent me a few photographs from his interview with Dateline, which you can see on the right (Gregg is at the left in the photo).

Nick Hackeney is currently serving a more than 26 year sentence in prison for the murder.

I’ve not yet heard when Dateline plans to run the Kitsap segment.

Share on Facebook

Tweet This Post 

Climbing ladders has been disastrous for Kitsap County Sheriff Steve Boyer these past few years.

Just after Christmas, Boyer, whom I saw yesterday during a visit by Washington State Attorney General Rob McKenna, was packing up decorations in a garage attic. The ladder gave way, and he fell, breaking his foot and leaving him badly bumped and bruised.

An injury like that couldn’t keep the sheriff away from work for long, however. He’s currently keeping weight off his foot with a wheeled device that he can prop up his knee on.

In October 2007, the sheriff also had a bad fall off a ladder while cleaning his gutters, in which he sustained a broken pelvis.

He was in good spirits Thursday, accompanying McKenna to meet with West Sound Narcotics Enforcement Team detectives, emergency management and 911 dispatching employees, state troopers, the Silverdale Rotary Club and the Kitsap Sun’s editorial board.

Share on Facebook

Tweet This Post 

Remember a Bremerton attorney’s quest to get a Bremerton parking ordinance tossed?

Well, the effort has died.

Washington State Supreme Court Commissioner Steven Goff denied attorney Thomas Weaver’s appeal of a $45 parking ticket late last year. Weaver had hoped to argue before the state’s supreme court that Bremerton’s ordinance about citing drivers who are parked on city streets with expired tabs is unlawful.

He based his argument on the idea that state law “preempts” the ordinance by making it illegal to drive with expired tabs, but not to be parked with them. Bremerton’s ordinance takes the law a step further.

As a quick side note, I actually had a chance to talk with Goff, who reviews cases and can deny them from being heard before the state supreme court. His position, a filter of sorts, is not well known.

Goff serves at the behest of the court, whom he not only can recommend cases to, but as in Weaver’s case, can deny them as well. He also has a staff of attorneys to help him. The commissioner, in short, helps ease the burden of the caseload the court reviews.

Share on Facebook

Tweet This Post 

A noteworthy legal issue emerged this week during the Kitsap County Superior Court trial of a Bremerton man accused of unlawfully possessing a firearm.

A man watching the trial in the courtroom wore a T-shirt that said something to the effect of “Jury Nullification is Constitutional.” Deputy Prosecutor Giovanna Mosca pointed the shirt out to Judge Sally Olsen, who took quick action.

She asked the man, who had previously been wearing a coat covering the shirt, if he would put the jacket back on. He obliged.

Olsen also made certain that the jury, which wasn’t in the courtroom when the man took off his jacket, had not seen the message. On the advice of Mosca, she called one juror in the courtroom to determine if he had come into contact with “anyone in the front row,” without specifically identifying the man. The juror said he had not.

But why did Olsen go to all that trouble over a shirt?

First, here’s a little background on the case: Luke T. Groves was ultimately convicted of two counts of unlawful possession of a firearm.

His gun ownership rights were revoked in 1990, when he was convicted of a felony for breaking into a Shelton school. He claimed that he was never informed that his gun-ownership rights were revoked for life and he argued that he wasn’t in possession of the guns, since they belong to his wife.

The prosecution’s case was straightforward; police found a rifle and pistol in Groves’ Hewitt Avenue home and he is a convicted felon, making him in violation of the law.

But there were many issues the jury was not allowed to consider in the case, notably the question of whether he was ever told that felons aren’t allowed to have guns. Groves’ defense attorney also was limited in her ability to argue the question of who “possessed” the guns.

In a roundabout way, those limitations and the instructions given to the jury in the Groves trial were behind the jury nullification t-shirt controversy.

Jury nullification is basically the idea that jurors can choose to disregard the law and acquit a defendant if they feel the law — or the way it’s being applied — is wrong.

There are many famous cases in which juries have chosen to “nullify” a law and acquit a defendant, but several decisions have affirmed our court system’s disapproval of it. (Here’s one.) In the Groves case, the instructions to the jury included the line: “It … is your duty to accept the law from (the judge’s) instructions, regardless of what you personally believe the law is or what you personally think it should be.”

And what about the man’s right to wear such a shirt in court?

For the answer, I drew on the expertise of Stewart Jay, a University of Washington law professor who specializes in constitutional law.

Put simply, Judge Olsen’s duty to ensure a fair trial overrides the man’s First Amendment right to express himself by wearing the T-shirt. Jay cites several examples of ways in which such speech is curbed: Campaigners aren’t allowed near polling stations for fear of intimidating voters, and the classic example of yelling “Fire!” in a crowded theater.

“A judge is always concerned with any attempt by a member of audience to influence a member of the jury,” he said.

Share on Facebook

Tweet This Post 

Share on Facebook

Tweet This Post 

A waitress is taking a Silverdale restaurant to court, claiming the restaurant’s manager “withheld” tips, according to documents filed in Kitsap County Superior Court Dec. 14.

The lawsuit alleges that the restaurant manager “willfully withheld 60 percent of the tips,” that the waitress was supposed to receive, and “only paid to her 40 percent of the tips she received waiting tables in the course of her employment,” according to court documents.

There’s an “amended” lawsuit in the case file that states that sometime this past fall, the waitress had 50 percent of the tips withheld, rather than 60.

The lawsuit calls for the restaurant to pay damages, to include the amount of the “wrongfully withheld tips,” and interest, and attorney’s fees.

No court dates have yet been filed in the case.

Read more lawsuits in the Civil Justice category.

Share on Facebook

Tweet This Post 

Read the Previous Stories in the Case:

Bainbridge Teacher’s Aide Charged With Indecent Liberties

Trial Begins for Bainbridge School Aide Accused of Inappropriate Touching

Live blog of the trial, week 1

Boy Testifies He Saw Bainbridge School Aid Touch Girl

Bainbridge Paraeducator Denies Allegations of Inappropriate Touching

Jurors Deliberating Fate of Bainbridge Educator Accused of Indecent Liberties

Jury Acquits Bainbridge Paraeducator

Share on Facebook

Tweet This Post