Kitsap Caucus

A blog about politics and government in Kitsap County as well as Washington state political news as it relates to Kitsap County.
Subscribe to RSS

Kilmer bucks his party in one vote the Washington Post counts as key

January 29th, 2013 by Steven Gardner

If the 2014 congressional election started today (I found a page showing incumbent Congressman Derek Kilmer has raised $15.55 so far. I’m guessing the total is actually more than that, but we have nothing official yet.) here is a campaign charge you might hear.

“Derek Kilmer has voted with his party 97 percent of the time.”

Or maybe this one:

“Derek Kilmer has voted with Nancy Pelosi nine out of 10 times.”

Both quotes are true, but they lack context. There have been 30 votes in the U.S. House of Representatives since Kilmer joined it earlier this month. Some are procedural and don’t deal with issues at all, like voting to approve Congress’ journal or to adjourn. If either of those mattered we might hear this one:

“Doc Hastings was the only Washington member of Congress with the guts to vote to adjourn.”

We’ve addressed this before, but it’s worth repeating. Context matters. Of the 30 votes taken in Congress, the two parties agreed with each other 11 times. Again, those were procedural issues. The first vote after the roll call was on who should be named House speaker. Republicans voted for John Boehner. Kilmer voted with Democrats for Nancy Pelosi. That shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone. Kilmer is a Democrat, after all, and he wanted to see his party’s leader holding the gavel. Everyone knew it wouldn’t happen and it didn’t.

On the other 19 votes, many were questions on the same issue, and Kilmer agreed with the majority in his party on all but one of them.

That one is critical. Of the 30 votes taken, two were considered “key votes” in the Washington Post vote database. One was the race for speaker. I guess I agree that one probably should be considered “key,” but not like the other one on the list of two. That was the one to suspend the debt limit until May and to suspend Congressional pay starting April 15 if there is no budget. On that one a majority of Republicans voted “Yes,” and a majority of Democrats voted “No.” Kilmer, in this case sided with Republicans. He issued a statement saying why he thought the measure was a good one.

“I believe America should pay its bills even if they were racked up before I came to DC. This plan prevents the immediate threat of default that could cause harm to our nation’s economy. Hopefully, this is the first step toward a real bipartisan effort to forge a balanced solution to our long-term fiscal challenges. This plan also forces Congress to live by the same principle that all folks in our region live by: if you don’t do your job, you shouldn’t be paid. I’m supporting this bill today because I’ve always said I’ll do what’s right for the families and employers of our region, regardless of whether it’s a Democratic or Republican idea.”

Kilmer wasn’t alone among Washington Democrats, joining fellow freshmen Denny Heck and Suzan DelBene. Jaime Herrera Beutler, a Camas Republican, voted contrary to her party on the same vote.

Just as it’s almost worthless to draft statistics that include meaningless votes on procedure, it’s way too early to form conclusions on a voting record that only includes two votes that seem to matter. Nonetheless, stay tuned to the “key” votes tally and see if bipartisanship spreads.

Tags: , , ,

Email This Post Email This Post Print This Post Print This Post

9 Responses to “Kilmer bucks his party in one vote the Washington Post counts as key”

  1. Judy Says:

    I fully agree with Mr Kilmer’s statement. I appreciate his willingness to vote for what is right and not for what his party tells him to. That’s what I voted for! Thank you Mr Kilmer

  2. Stone Says:

    I suspect that he will be punished appropriately for his anti party actions. First term legislators are often independent and idealistic. The only way they can survive in D.C. is to sell their soul and abandon their “churlish” ways.

  3. Stone Says:

    By the way, I agree with Judy. That’s why I voted for him, too.

  4. Bruce Day Says:

    I submitted a comment, and I got a statement that my email was not proper.

    Seems the Sun still dumps submissions from those who don’t follow the party line.

    It’s been a long time since I have been here. It will be a long time before I return, if ever.

    I hope you all enjoy hearing just one side of the story, comrades.

  5. Jeff West Says:

    Independence and the willingness to vote for what is best for everyone without party BS and the normal DC double speak is refreshing. That is exactly what I was hoping for. Good Job!

  6. Tim Johnsrude Says:

    I am not a Democrat and, not surprisingly, rarely agree with their platform. No matter, it is dishonest ‘journalism’ to report misleading statistics about anyone or anything. Although it wasn’t technically a lie, the intent was clear.

    This is really an indictment against the media to allow this kind of reporting to continue. An editor that allows this kind of news to be printed is not worthy of the title in a society that relies on a free press.

    The internet has exacerbated this unfortunately. It is a powerful communications tool,and a powerful weapon.

  7. Judi Says:

    Though I didn’t vote for Kilmer in the election , I’m glad to see that at least out of the first big ” horse-race” he’s a winner in my estimation. Thankyou Mr. Kilmer!

  8. Steven Gardner Says:

    Tim,

    I am flabbergasted by your comment. I thought my intent was clear, to tell you to be careful about campaign claims that could and probably will be made as the 2014 campaign approaches. I think a blog entry that illustrates with examples how statistics can be manipulated is a worthwhile journalistic endeavor.

    In fact, let me give you a link from Factcheck.org that goes over claims from the 2010 election that did exactly what I tried to illustrate.

    http://www.factcheck.org/2010/10/nrcc-overstates-dems-voting-record-with-pelosi/

    And here’s the message at the end: “Bottom line: Voters beware. Candidates, parties and independent groups tailor voting numbers to strengthen their message — and ignore those numbers that would undercut it.”

    Steven Gardner
    Kitsap Caucus

  9. Dave Says:

    Touting this vote as major is deceptive. Sure, it looks like it makes Kilmer a believer in fiscal responsibility but I’m sure he knows that obama will veto any House approved legislation unless it agrees with his agenda. Let’s see how Kilmer votes on tax and spend issues. The proof is in the pudding.

Leave a Reply

Before you post, please complete the prompt below.

Please enter the word MILK here:

Available on Kindle

Polls

If someone employed by an elected official then runs against that elected official, should the employee be fired?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Primary Election

Politifact Truth-O-Meter

Kitsap Caucus Views since Jan. 4, 2013

Archives

About Kitsap Caucus

Kitsap Sun reporters blog about politics, government and other wonkisms of import to Kitsap County.

Kitsap Caucus

Promote Your Page Too