Web Search powered by Yahoo! SEARCH
If 10 people in the 35th District who voted for Marco Brown had instead voted for Brad Gehring, the race would have qualified for an automatic recount. That’s six-one-hundredths of 1 percent of those who voted Republican.
If 100 people in the 35th District who voted for Marco Brown had instead voted for Brad Gehring, the candidates would be separated by one vote.
This entry was posted on Wednesday, September 3rd, 2008 at 6:52 pm and is filed under Election 2008, Legislature, Republicans. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Email This Post
Print This Post
Scripps Interactive Newspapers Group
Kitsap Caucus is proudly powered by
WordPress MU running on PugetSoundBlogs.com.
Entries (RSS)
and Comments (RSS).
Tweet This Post links powered by Tweet This v1.3.9, a WordPress plugin for Twitter.
![[Post to Twitter]](http://pugetsoundblogs.com/kitsap-caucus/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter.png){kind=icon}
September 3rd, 2008 at 6:58 pm
Of course, if it barely got within the automatic recount trigger… I’m not sure Gehring would have a chance in the recount.
September 3rd, 2008 at 7:35 pm
It is too bad. Brad was the better candidate. But time to rally around Marco now.
September 3rd, 2008 at 10:28 pm
…and for those who don’t think their single vote makes a difference!
September 4th, 2008 at 5:55 am
Issues of votes means thinking about the Auditor position. See YouTube: http://www.YouTube.com elect John Clark Kitsap Auditor.
Mr. John Clark is an impressive candidate and he deserves a close examination and a vote for him.
September 4th, 2008 at 4:20 pm
If ifs and buts were candies and nuts, we’d all have a really nice Christmas. Reality means a whole lot more than the fantasy of “what if?”.
September 4th, 2008 at 6:35 pm
Thanks for not using the dirty version of that response, Joe.