After compiling an earlier story on what the General Election told us, I received an e-mail expressing surprise that I didn’t mention how the county commissioner’s race between Democrat Charlotte Garrido and Republican Tim Matthes played out commissioner-district-by-district. The writer made the case that Garrido lost in her own district and in Central Kitsap, but won the South district seat by winning an overwhelming margin in North Kitsap and Bainbridge Island.
It is a common complaint that Kitsap County looks more liberal than it is, because voters in Bainbridge Island skew the results. While there is no question that the island tilts to the left, I question whether you can discount the results of an entire county because one part of it leans a certain direction. Islanders, much to the chagrin of some who do or don’t live on the rock, are part of this county, as much as those right-leaning folks who live in Silverdale or in South Kitsap.
George Will pointed out in a column dismissing arguments by Hillary Clinton’s supporters in the Democratic primaries — when they argued that had Democrats used the same rules as Republicans, then their candidate would have won — that rules are a “pesky nuisance.”
“She (Clinton) may think, or at least would argue, that when she was 12 her Yankees really won the 1960 World Series, by standards of “fairness,” because they trounced the Pirates in runs scored, 55-27, over seven games, so there.
Unfortunately, baseball’s rules – pesky nuisances, rules – say it matters how runs are distributed during a World Series.
The Pirates won four games, which is the point of the exercise, by a total margin of seven runs, while the Yankees were winning three by a total of 35 runs. You can look it up.”
Consider our conversations here and again over here about the Electoral College.
Nonetheless, it is an interesting question to pursue, if true that Garrido lost in the district she will now represent. It will add fuel, certainly, to those who would like to see the race for commissioner be decided more like a congressional race. In other words, you vote for your own rep to represent you against those dimwits in the other districts.
For those of you still wondering, the speculation was indeed true. Matthes won handily in the South, by a few points in the central district and lost by a ton in the North, which includes the island.
In District 2, the district making up the southern part of the county, Matthes received 53.7 percent of the vote to Garrido’s 46.3 percent.
In District 3, the central, Matthes received 52 percent to Garrido’s 48.
In the North and Bainbridge, Garrido received 56.7 percent of the vote, while Matthes received 43.3 percent.
This discussion should not occur without an exploration of voter turnout. The North district has about 7,500 more registered voters than the South district and about 8,500 more than the Central district. Turnout in the north was 89 percent. In the South and Central it was about 85 percent.
If voters in the South and Central had voted at the same rate as their fellow Kitsapers in the North and on Bainbridge, it would have narrowed the margin by about 600 votes. That wouldn’t have been enough for Matthes to win or to spark an automatic recount, but Matthes would have lost by less than a percentage point, instead of by just under 1.5 percentage points.
Matthes supporters can still argue that they lost because of the skew from the North and Bainbridge, but the case would be stronger had voters in the South shown up at the same rate those in the North and on the island did.
Recent Comments