<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Seven Bainbridge teaching jobs saved by grassroots campaign</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pugetsoundblogs.com/bainbridge-conversation/2009/06/30/seven-bainbridge-teaching-jobs-saved-by-grassroots-campaign/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pugetsoundblogs.com/bainbridge-conversation/2009/06/30/seven-bainbridge-teaching-jobs-saved-by-grassroots-campaign/</link>
	<description>Reporter Tristan Baurick engages island residents in a conversation about their community.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:14:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James M. Olsen, Shining City Media</title>
		<link>http://pugetsoundblogs.com/bainbridge-conversation/2009/06/30/seven-bainbridge-teaching-jobs-saved-by-grassroots-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-6566</link>
		<dc:creator>James M. Olsen, Shining City Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 02:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pugetsoundblogs.com/bainbridge-conversation/?p=6278#comment-6566</guid>
		<description>The difference between the SOT -- Save Our Teachers -- campaign and the failed $42,000,000 bond effort is SOT is voluntary.  SOT campaign identified a specific need -- loss of teahcer -- and a voluntary effort to raise money.  The failed $42,000,000 bond was ill-defined, mandatory and not specific. Oh, yes, the ostensible reason was the repair of Wilkes but no answer was given why the rebuild amount was 100% overstated or why we had another $10,000,000 added to a bloated rebuild project.

I would caution BISD from extrapolating from the SOT success that voters are primed for another bloated bond submission.

I personally believe the shortage of teachers is a direct result of mis-priorities of BISD #303 LEADERSHIP on how to run a district.  Let&#039;s see less front-office types and more on-the-street teachers.

BISD #303:  beware of submitting another bloated bond in the name of the children.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The difference between the SOT &#8212; Save Our Teachers &#8212; campaign and the failed $42,000,000 bond effort is SOT is voluntary.  SOT campaign identified a specific need &#8212; loss of teahcer &#8212; and a voluntary effort to raise money.  The failed $42,000,000 bond was ill-defined, mandatory and not specific. Oh, yes, the ostensible reason was the repair of Wilkes but no answer was given why the rebuild amount was 100% overstated or why we had another $10,000,000 added to a bloated rebuild project.</p>
<p>I would caution BISD from extrapolating from the SOT success that voters are primed for another bloated bond submission.</p>
<p>I personally believe the shortage of teachers is a direct result of mis-priorities of BISD #303 LEADERSHIP on how to run a district.  Let&#8217;s see less front-office types and more on-the-street teachers.</p>
<p>BISD #303:  beware of submitting another bloated bond in the name of the children.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

